Desire is the culprit

Share this Post....
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

The thing about the Catholic priests, the thing that caught my attention as a child, was the extent to which they were off limits, and therefore safe to desire. At least the good looking and kindly ones were.

The creepy ones, the priests like Father Flynn who took the year nines for religious instruction, were always best avoided.  Not that Father Flynn had a reputation for doing things to girls – I knew little about what happened to boys, in my single sex school, except from my brothers who talked only of ‘getting the cuts’ on a regular basis – but we all knew enough to avoid sitting alone with Father Flynn because of our discomfort at his difficult and blush inducing questions.

‘Do you have your periods yet?  None of his business.

‘Do you know how babies are born?’ Why ask, unless he wanted to teach us?

‘Do you know what parts of the body are active during the procreative act?’

Father Flynn loved the word procreation and although it seemed innocent enough in the bible, at least in places, rolling out on Father Flynn’s tongue, it held a measure of salaciousness we could not escape.

And so we learned to avoid him.

My mother worried for the parish priests wherever we lived. She worried that the priest’s job was too harsh, that the loneliness must have been crippling and that the priest might resort to alcohol late at night for comfort, or some such thing.

She never talked about the priests’ sexual relations with women other than to tell me about her opposition to non- celibacy in the priesthood.

My mother needed her priests to be celibate.

‘How could I talk to a priest who might then go home to his wife burdened with my story?

I wondered then what story my mother wanted hidden from the rest of the world.  What thing could she have done that was so outrageous only the priest could know.

It must have something to do with her own sinfulness.

My mother took sin seriously, or at least so she told me. She was after all raised by a woman, my grandmother, my oma, who suffered from scruples.

My oma went to Mass every day of the week, even through the freezing cold of Dutch winters, to the cathedral-like church of St Bavo, and once a week she confessed her sins to the priest.

After she had told him about the dreadful things she considered she had done to besmirch her own and God’s name, my grandmother went back home to complete her penance, a few prayers and a promise not to sin again.

Hours later she returned to the priest in his confessional.

‘You have absolved my sins father,’ she said. ‘But you got it wrong. Those sins are far worse than you realise,’ and she repeated the detail of her sins again, those anonymous sins that none of us know about to this day – we can only imagine – and again the priest remained unimpressed.  But he increased his list of penance prayers so that my grandmother should go home cleansed, unburdened and ready to attend to her family and life as a good Dutch woman in Haarlem Holland between the wars.

Still not satisfied my grandmother returned yet again for the late shift at the confessional – in those days the queues for confession could be so long the priests needed to hold multiple sessions – and this time she urged the priest to take her even more seriously.

She had sinned grievously. Did he not realise the severity of her sin?  Once again the priest tried to humour my grandmother by requesting not just one decade of the rosary but ten.

And still my grand mother was not appeased.

She could not be forgiven her sins; no matter how hard the priest tried.

My mother then lived under the weight of such a conscience stricken woman and tried to escape the burden by hiding herself away in books.

In medieval times, monks used scruples, the knots tied to the end of ropes and attached to sticks with which to flog themselves.

‘Mea culpa, mea culpa mea maxima culpa.’

images-1

These days we ascribe such impulses to an over active superego or to something maybe even more sinister, to some masochistic impulse to wash away our pain/sin under the weight of some bullying impulse within that gets satisfaction out of hurting ourselves.

For the monks and priests of the past – though I would not be one bit surprised if it still goes on today – it was a way of honouring God, making oneself pure and desire free in his eyes.

Desire was the culprit, desire for all things considered sinful: money, food and drink but mostly sex, lust, desire for another’s body, desire for the satisfaction of one’s own body.

My grandmother’s visits to the priest in confession might have been her way of flagellating herself.  Certainly, from what my mother said, the priests who attended my grandmother felt flagellated.

The priests in my mother’s home town and at the cathedral of Saint Bavo wanted to offer relief, not more pain, but my grandmother would have none of it and the pain must have extended to her diet.

In one of his journal entries, one of my uncles, a Franciscan priest, wrote:

‘The unusual habits of mother during her pregnancy, especially in her choice of food, made her vitamin deficit and could have given her children a form of rickets as our dentist pointed out.’

For my oma, all desire was bad.  Desire was to be squashed.

And yet without desire there can be no pleasurable expectation, no sense of the value of anything.

And worse still when our desires but must not even be considered.

Therein lies a problem for the priests. The need to be celibate in thought and deed.

How do you straitjacket your mind, when your mind will have its own way?

Unless you split off your desires into denial or slip into situations where your right hand does not know or recognise what your left hand is doing.

 

 

Share this Post....
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Pin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

6 Comments on Desire is the culprit

  1. Kass
    March 7, 2016 at 1:58 am (1 year ago)

    Oh, how tangled, heavy-laden and confusing your religious and home influences must have been. I think we all share deep issues arising from the tyranny of our upbringing.

    Reply
    • Elisabeth
      March 11, 2016 at 2:47 pm (1 year ago)

      ‘The tyranny of our upbringing’ what a terrific expression, Kass. It can indeed be like this, though hopefully some of us at least manage to escape that oppression, but the aftertaste remains. Thanks.

      Reply
  2. Jim Murdoch
    March 7, 2016 at 2:45 am (1 year ago)

    I’ve never understood the whole celibacy thing. It’s simple unscriptural and, as you point out, unnatural. It’s only a shame the Bible writers said so little about the women in their lives but Peter, arguably the first pope, was certainly married and shared his home with his mother-in-law and brother. If that doesn’t set a precedent I don’t know what does. That doesn’t mean the Bible didn’t say a little time apart was bad—“Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.” (1 Cor. 7:5)—but the whole point was that it was a temporary thing; we’re not designed—most of us anyway—to do without sex for any length of time and it’s asking for trouble expecting grown men to keep their hands to themselves especially when they’re forced to sit in little dark boxes and listen to what everyone else has been getting up to in the privacy of their own homes and behind the gasworks and then being forgiven for their transgressions with such ease.

    Desire is one of those words that comes with riders. Is it so wrong to want things? But it is to desire them. I remember someone pointing out to me the lyrics in a Dylan song were not “I love you,” but “I want you,” and he thought that was interesting and significant and we certainly talked about it for a while. Love so often gets in the way—the need for love, the expectation of love—when often we simple want something. Perhaps this is why I’ve always had a bit of a fascination—albeit a romanticised one I fully admit—with prostitutes. Like you I was brought up in a world where sex was only supposed to take part within the bonds of marriage but nowadays sex is just something people do. Its significance has been diminished somewhat. People go to the pub, watch a game of football, see a film, have sex: it’s all much the same. I would’ve loved to have been a part of all that but there’s nothing remotely casual about me and even now if I did encounter a prostitute I know for a fact, guaranteed, I’d just want to sit and talk to her; I wouldn’t want to waste the opportunity on sex.

    My dad tried to explain to me once the fundamental difference between a perfect and an imperfect man. It was all down to the self: a perfect man was, he said, fundamentally selfless whereas an imperfect man would always think of himself first. This tainted everything for me. It didn’t matter what I wanted or whether it was right or wrong or good or bad for me. Simply wanting it reminded me that I was veering towards sin. It sucked the fun out of everything and so, eventually—inevitably, I’d say—I started getting off (in the broadest sense) on guilt just as I imagine some of those flagellating priests will have started to enjoy beating themselves.

    The Bible insisted we walk in Jesus’s footsteps knowing we had no choice but to fail. I heard a good way of thinking about it once. Imagine you’re walking down the beach and you come across some footprints in the sand and decide to walk in them for a bit of fun but whoever made them was a foot taller than you. You’d have to strain to walk like him. The point the speaker was making was that it took effort but what I took from it was that he was expecting us to act unnaturally, to force ourselves to be something we were not. I never could.

    As you know I struggled with religion for many years—once it gets its hooks in you… well, you know where I’m going—and it’s interesting seeing some of the poems I’m posting on my website at the moment—I don’t know if you’ve been following them—all infused with guilt and all because of desire. Today’s is a particularly good one.

    Reply
    • Elisabeth
      March 11, 2016 at 2:55 pm (1 year ago)

      I’ve been reading about desire in feminist theory, Jim, the idea that to want is okay as an active experience, but to want to be wanted is not considered okay and is deemed to be more passive and therefore more often ascribed to the female. I’m not putting this well here, but it strikes me to desire is to be human and without desire we might as well be dead. The issue is about how we deal with our desires and how much they connect with our needs. It’s funny whenever I read about the bible I tend to implode a little as if i’m faced with a wall of words even as I know there are many beautiful words in the bible, only I often find it hard to connect with them these days, not so your poetry. Thanks, Jim.

      Reply
  3. Kirk
    March 7, 2016 at 5:38 am (1 year ago)

    They told me to take a streetcar named Desire and then transfer to one called Cemeteries and ride six blocks and get off at – Elysian Fields!

    –Blanche DuBois

    Reply
    • Elisabeth
      March 7, 2016 at 9:31 am (1 year ago)

      Sex then death hey, Kirk. Great quote. Thanks.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *