No breasts allowed

I spent the early hours of this morning dreaming about nipples.  I was at a psychotherapy conference and the
topic was on infant observation, the business of taking time out, an hour a
week for at least a year to observe the earliest days of a baby’s life, most
likely in the company of its mother and/or father. 
The talk had been boring, safe and non-controversial. I
wanted to liven it up with stories.  I
wanted anecdotes or some illustrations of the sorts of things that can happen
to lift the topic away from theoretical abstraction. 
I rehearsed a comment in my head that went along these
lines:  my daughter had painted a picture,
on a huge canvas of a gigantic nipple, a red orb and in its centre a tiny white
spot. 
I knew as soon as I mentioned the word nipple, people would
start to vibrate with the embarrassment of it all.  As if I were using a swear word. 
Nipples in the context of babies are all about nourishment
and survival and there is huge pleasure in that as well as frustration and anxiety
and all the things that go along with disappointing feeds. 
Nipples are also eroticised for the benefits of sexual desire. 
Why this dream?
I saw an image as I flashed through Facebook yesterday of a
muscular man with a so-called six pack who had cut out the nipples from images
of celebrities, one of whom was Beyoncé, the other I can’t remember – one in black and white, the other in colour – and he had pasted these nipples over his own. 
His picture reminded me of the way strippers look when they
paste those little suction caps and tassels over their own nipples when at work.  The sort you see in movies. 
It looked ridiculous and all of this to make the point that Facebook’s
policy on covering up female nipples is hypocritical when it’s okay to put the
male nipple on display. 
I have wondered about this often alongside the furore that erupts
from time to time when breastfeeding mothers are escorted from the premises for
feeding their babies in public. 
No breasts allowed. 
And yet breasts are visible everywhere, in whole or in part,
small or large, floppy or firm. 
Why do female breasts evoke such a passionate response.
I reckon it has to do with those unspoken unrecognised
infantile desires in all of us for a feed, for a mother and for all that those
breasts represent, but I may be wrong here. 

The appearance of things

This morning, I’m working against the clatter of back ground
voices as my husband convenes a business meeting of sorts in our kitchen with
friends/clients whom he helps out from time to time. 
Last night he told me they wanted a nine o’clock start. 
Nine in the morning.  On
a Sunday. 
It was okay, he said. 
I could just get about as I normally do on a Sunday morning without
interruption, only the presence of strangers in the house meant I was not
comfortable staying in my dressing gown for hours. 
It meant I needed to take a fast shower and dress enough to
be respectable. Not that my dressing gown is not respectable.  It’s a little on the eccentric side or so my
daughters tell me.  Black and white
swirls.  It makes me look like a cartoon
character, especially when set off against my pale pink and white striped bed
socks. 
I made my tea before these people arrived and now it’s
already cold and I’m struck by the effect of such an intrusion on my writing
time.
It chases away my memory of last night’s dreams, and shifts
the immediacy of the moment into my head. 
The voices in the kitchen are silent for a few minutes and I
find I am distracted once more. 
During the quiet moments my husband will be reading some
document or other and the others around the table will wait in silence for the
verdict, his interpretation of what to them is otherwise double Dutch. 
My husband is knowledgeable on the nature of contracts, those
legal arrangements that people make with one another with all sorts of
conditions and caveats to protect both parties. 
My husband is a stickler for fair and reasonable contracts
wherein the needs of both parties are met. 
It applies to property and wills and all matters related to births,
deaths and marriages.
We made a contract with one another last night.
I promised him I would leave him to get himself organised in
the morning.  I would not set the alarm,
as is my custom, not on Sunday morning, the one day of the week where we sleep
in. 
He said that was fine. 
I could hide away and behave as usual. 
He would deal with his visitors.
I opened my eyes to the day at twenty to nine and woke him,
because I realised if he did not get a move on, he would be greeting his guests
in his dressing gown and although it’s not as garish as mine, I think he’d
prefer he were ready for such visitors. 
This is another thing we do; we break our contracts as the
need arises.  They are, after all, not necessarily
set in stone. 
If I had been able to fall back to sleep there and then, I
might have done, but instead I was awake, enough to get myself into readiness
to write and this ideally involves the absence of all distractions; like those
voices from the kitchen. 
The clothes I put on this morning do not match.  Dark blue jeans with a flecked pattern, a
hand me down from one of my daughters. 
She discards her clothes before they’re worn out and I can’t
bear to see them go to waste and so I wear them on weekends when it does not
matter that I wear trousers chosen by someone else for someone else. 
They clash with the orange top I chose as a contrast.  Too much of a contrast, I fear and as I type
and look down to my middle I’m assaulted by this clash. 

And because it’s cold, cold beyond my usual
expectations of winter cold, I chose my cable knit cardigan, a cardigan I only
wear when the temperatures drop below ten degrees Celsius. 
My body is inclined to cook inside this cardigan and the visible
clash worsens.
I spend a lot of time travelling through Facebook and the
number of times I see posts that emphasize appearance is alarming. 
The appearance of things. 
People visit this house and they say it’s lovely, but
immediately my thoughts streak back to the underlying disorder of this house,
the fact there are cracks in walls, it needs a repaint inside and out and there
are places in the parquetry where the dog has dug up tiles. 
My husband never quite finished lining all the floorboards
and over time, over thirty years or so, we’ve grown used to the gaps, but
they’re obvious if you look below the surface. 
The way Sherlock Holmes of the recent TV series can greet a
person for the first time and instantly from his perceptive eye pick up all
sorts of minor details about this person such that he can even know what he’s
had for breakfast. 
Most of us do not have such perceptive vision, and yet we all
see below the surface.  We see things
that are not there, too.  We reverberate
against one another.
I decide almost instantly on whether or not I like a person,
whether I want to spend more time with that person, whether that person is
simpatico. 
Most of my decision is based, not only on the appearance of
things, but also on that unspoken thing called ‘transference’, the degree to
which I superimpose my experience of significant others from my life,
especially from my childhood, onto them and they do likewise to me. 
And so it goes, we make up stories about other people in the
back of our minds and we may be completely off in real terms, but it fits our
expectations, and can influence our behaviour. 
There’s a problem here, not just in the business of ‘love at
first sight’ but also, its opposite, ‘hate at first sight’, which most often
sprouts from prejudice, from all the ’isms: racism, ageism, and our tendency to
stereotype. 
Best to reserve judgment, therefore whenever we meet new
people.  Maybe get to know them a little
before we decide.