Accidents happen

I ran away once.  Down to the park.  I planned never to return. 
The glazier had propped the sheet
of glass against the sideway fence, thick and glossy.  He dropped it off that morning to replace the glass in the
back bedroom window, which one of my brothers had taken out with a tennis
ball.  My mother had been angry
when it happened, only a little. 
She understood she said, ‘accidents happen’. 
She was in the kitchen cooking
porridge, stirring the lumpy white goo in the pot at the Kooka.  She stood in her dressing gown, pink
quilted chenille with an apron tied around her waist.  Not much waist to see. 
Her stomach muscles had gone she said, she had lost them having
babies. 
I heard the tinkle of glass and ran
out into the back yard where my brothers stood red faced and panicking. 
Our father had left for work.  His ghost was there, the traces of his
spirit hovering in the background. 
We knew had he been there, he would have burst into rage.  But my mother was only a little bit
angry.  Enough to remember to turn
off the stove when she came out to see the damage done. 
My mother had lived through the
Second World War when the Nazis invaded her country, she had lived on nothing
but tulip bulb soup for weeks in a row. 
They flavoured it with salt. 
She knew about the unexpected things that happen and she could get
scared, but not today because my father was not there. 
My mother was only ever scared when
my father was there because he was the angry one and most often times he was
angry with her.  I do not know why
he was angry with her, except she seemed always to get it wrong.  She upset him.  She cooked his food wrong.  She ironed his clothes wrong.  She dressed herself wrong and most of
all she could not keep us quiet when he was trying to study for his accountancy
exams;  when he was trying to watch
the television; when he was trying to sleep. 
After breakfast, I ate the porridge
holding my breath because although she had remembered to turn off the stove
before she went outside my mother had still burnt it.  The porridge had a bitter taste.
After breakfast I went outside with
my tennis ball.  I bounced it up
and down  in front of me as I
walked.  I bounced my ball down the
kitchen step onto the concrete path that led to the laundry one way, the
washing line the other.  I followed
the concrete path out and around the washing line then retraced my steps back
to the kitchen door, down beside the laundry and out onto the footpath that
leads to the front yard and the street. 
I walked up and down the side path
past the sheet of glass, counting the whole time, 95, 96, 97.  I was aiming for 200.  The ball hit a rut in the
concrete.  I had aimed badly and
the ball ricocheted off in the direction of the glass.  It smashed a chunk off the corner and
the broken piece landed on the footpath and shattered into smaller pieces.  They glinted in the sun.  It was not a loud shattering but it was
loud enough to send my mother running from the kitchen. 
She looked at the glass, she looked
at me and her face went red, her eyes narrowed and she yelled at me.
‘Not again.  How could you?’
What did she mean not again, as if
I had done it in the first place?
I ran away from home, determined
never to return.  My father’s anger
was a given, but my mother’s anger was intolerable.   I had lost her forever. 

Bare chests and exposed breasts.

I’m stuck on an issue which on the
surface seems lightweight but for the moment it won’t leave me alone.  I’ve mentioned before the No place for sheep blog, where its curator, Jennifer Wilson,  puts up posts from time to time on controversial and to me
fascinating topics. 
Recently she posted a picture of
one Damon Young, philosopher from Melbourne university and a chap who has of
late developed a reputation as a social commentator and thinker at the
forefront of our community.  In
other words his popularity is on the rise.  He’s also the father of two young children, with an
accomplished wife.  An all round
good guy.
Damon put up a photo of himself, which
he took with his i-phone, and posted it on his website and on twitter.  In this photo he is naked from the
waist up.  It seems he took the
picture almost as an experiment but casually and I gather it might have something to do with
the furore raging here in Melbourne over the rights of women to breastfeed in
public.
I suppose it comes down to the
business of bearing your breasts in public. Damon can expose his chest
comfortably with little fear of derision, 
but women as a rule do not feel as free and easy about exposing
theirs. 
In her beautifully written blog
post, Jennifer Wilson wonders about why this might be. 
This post has hooked into my
preoccupations of late with the ways in which many men seem so much more
comfortable in commanding the limelight, not all of them mind you, but as a
group in contrast to the majority of women who command the limelight in a
different way, if at all, primarily as objects of beauty. 
I could go on for ages about this
but it’s not what troubles me. 
I’m troubled by the fuss that
erupted in the comments stream of Jennifer Wilson’s blog when I dared to
suggest that the conversation about what to me was an important topic seemed to
have become derailed into banter, light mockery and what I thought of as a sort
of posturing, which I ascribed to the largely male commenters –like a posse of
‘bare-chested Damons’. 
This need to make light of the
topic I thought might have to do with infantile anxiety aroused in relation to
the notion of female breasts and I said as much, politely I hope. 
I do not know in fact whether the
commenters on Jennifer’s blog are male or female because they do not represent
themselves as a rule by their own blogs. 
Many comment only and hide behind avatars and often unusual names. 
But they are forceful in their
views and dare I say they clobbered me, at least one person clobbered me, in my
feeble attempts at protest.
It’s not the first time I’ve found
myself risking decapitation for daring to speak out, and it’s not the first
time I’ve wondered why it is that the very thing I’m protesting about seems to happen. 
It’s not the first time I’ve found
myself in trouble in the blogosphere and no doubt it won’t be the last. 
I remember my timidity when I first
dared to speak on line, how fearful I was of upsetting anyone.  Now I’m less fearful but still conflict can cut through me even as I tell myself it does not matter a jot. 
These people are virtual
people.  If I met them in real life
I might find myself drawn to them, even though online we have crossed
swords.  These people might in real
life be more timid and shy than they are on the page.
It could be worse.  I could be living in a country where
women are not allowed to speak at all.  Not just women, but people of particular classes, religions
or sects.  It need not simply be
between the men and the women. 
It reminds me of the war between
the big endians and the little endians in Gullivers Travels.  The
big endians believed we should approach our boiled eggs from the big end, while
the little endians had formed the view you can only eat an egg from the little
end down.  This was enough to cause
a war. 
I have answered my own
question.  I shall regard this
dispute on line as akin to the one in Gulliver’s Travels.  It is
such a trivial concern in the scheme of things however much it points to bigger
and more concerning issues.