‘Hell is other people’

The Christmas I remember best is the one in which my father pulled over the Christmas tree after we had set it up in the lounge room.

It must have happened during one of his many fits of rage, where he wanted to make a point. Drunk and feeling rejected or unloved, he inflicted his pain on the rest of us. 

It seems almost trivial now, by way of memory, but at the time it felt indecent. 

My mother had brought ornaments all the way from Holland, small shining tear drop shaped baubles in golds and reds. One indented and coated in silver, the other deep crimson and round as a plum. 

These two broke and shattered across the floor. We kids stood back in our summer bare feet to stop ourselves from taking on splinters. 

The fallen tree had a sacrilegious feel, as though my father had smashed open the tabernacle in church. The place where the priest housed the left-over hosts after communion; the place where Christ’s body in the form of those white round Farex tasting wafers was meant to rest. 

Our Christmas tree was sacred. With its angel at the top and all the promise it held. 

This morning I listened to a short video of Marian Keyes in which she gives advice on how to treat yourself over Christmas, the stuff of being kind. 

Christmas is tough for many people, she reckons. She an Irish woman, in a Catholic country filled with people who drink too much, including her, though she describes herself as no longer drinking. 

One expression has stayed with me. Keyes talks about not allowing too much perfectionism, which to her mind leads impossible expectations. 

‘Expectations are disappointments under construction,’  she says. 

How’s that for an idea? 

It’s true: when you expect too much, you’re heading towards disappointment.

Yet expectation would have to be a close cousin of hope and I reckon we all need hope, otherwise why bother.

I hoped our Christmas might be good enough for us here, and it was. More than that, it was fun and no one who shared Christmas day with us seemed out of it, though I imagine inside their hearts there were some who found it tough. 

While others revelled in it.

Come Boxing Day, I’m blessedly relieved, to rest for the first time in an age and to enjoy our afternoon Boxing Day tradition of taking in a movie, the more magisterial the better.

In the last, we’ve watched all of the Hobbit movie and Lord of the Rings trilogy, year after year on Boxing Day, and now we’re onto Star Wars. 

This year’s Star Wars does not cop a good rating, but who cares? 

It’s not a movie I’d watch as first preference but two grandsons who love such hype and others too, it’s enough for me to bathe in reflected joy.

Afterwards we eat together, those of my lot who can make this pilgrimage to the Rivoli or the Lido, whichever movie house offers the best time and we debrief over Christmas and get ready for the holidays ahead. 

For most take holidays at this time of the year. 

And then to suggest something of the Grinch at Christmas, my husband showed us this newspaper clipping he’d kept from years gone by. 

His Horoscope in 2003, which presumably he shared with other Virgos:

Jean-Paul Satre’s famous saying that “hell is other people” is truer for Virgos than anyone. You’re surrounded by fools, nincompoops and absolute ning-nongs – but you can’t fail that patience exam, can you?

He and Marian Keyes might share something in common in terms of their awareness of the dark side of life, and both might plead for more good will. 

It’s a tough time of year, so watch your expectations. 

Even our gargoyle agrees.

A desk, a mess and a controversial cartoon

The mess on my desk is pushing in on me to the point I only have a small space from which to use my keypad and mouse.

It happens like this. I start with a tidy desk, plenty of space to right and left, a collection of biros and pens in pots, staplers to the side, paper clips in a little container, tissues handy, hand cleaner and mints all ready to go. 

Then I begin on a project and as I work away, I open books and papers and print out fresh sheets with new ideas that begin to pile around me. I write post it notes to remind me of where I’m at.

I write notes to remind me that today on top of my writing project I need to contact so and so or go to the supermarket for more dog food or speak to the electricity company or follow up with a friend. 

I list these jobs on scraps of paper and cross them off as I go, as the stack of papers and bric a brac of freshly opened bills piles up. There’s something about this mess I find comforting. Something in the fact that one day soon, I will decide enough is enough and I will begin to clear away the stuff I have dragged out from bookshelves and filing cabinets and I will put things back into some type of order, enough to allow me to begin the cycle all over again. 

For now, I will leave this mess even as the cords from my phone charger are flipping over the mouse pad on my desk and interfering with the smooth process of my typing. Even as I find myself pushing back the papers and books and bits and pieces to make room for my cup of tea and my typing fingers. 

Soon, I say soon, I will sort you. For now, my day is mapped out, a weekend day, a holiday day, a day when I get jobs completed. A trip to visit my daughter who has just started on the biggest journey of her life with a new baby son, only twenty days old now. What a time she has had in bringing him into the world and what a time she is having adjusting to her new life, the mother of a son who cluster feeds on demand and was initially very sleepy, to the point they needed to wake him for feeds. 

Now he is beginning to wake up and fresh challenges arise every day. I try to travel alongside her, to give support during what I also remember as one of the hardest times of my life, the mother of a newborn. The other hard time was teaching my children to learn to drive where life and death seemed too close for comfort. 

All this puts me in mind of Michael Leunig’s recent cartoon, one that set the local Melbourne world into a frenzy. 

How could he? The cartoon shows a mother walking along and pushing a pram, her eyes glued to her iPhone. The voice bubble comes from a tiny baby, a Leunig baby swaddled and lying on the footpath. The narrator voice-over observes how much this baby wishes his mother would love him as much as she loves her iPhone. 

We are left with the message the mother is so preoccupied with her phone she has not even noticed her baby fall out of its pram. Exaggerated, no doubt. And Leunig himself has written a letter of protest at how cruel people can be in response to his attempts to alert people to the dangers of ‘iPhone addiction’ as he calls it. 

Leunig is older than me and comes from a generation who struggle to come to grips with the way technology can dominate our lives. 

I don’t have as much trouble as Leunig.

I have a friend who tells me she has a photo of herself on a bed with her baby born in 1975. In the photo the baby is playing with a rattle and facing outwards from her mother, while the mother, my friend, is facing in the opposite direction and reading a book. 

Not an iphone, a book.

There is the fantasy that mothers must engage in eye contact with their babies almost all of the time. 

As if they do, as if they ever did.

Before my first baby was born, my husband offered to buy me a television so that when I fed at night, I could have the company of the TV screen. I had no idea what it might be like to feed a baby at night then. 

What I remember most clearly, at least at night: I had no desire to watch television while feeding my baby. I wanted only to sleep, and I fed each baby with eyes closed, seated in a low-lying bean bag on the floor so as not to fall asleep fully. Not with eyes fixed on the baby. And in the day, I looked at my babies as I fed and or held them but not every minute of every hold. 

I think there is an anxiety that derives from our infantile fear of not being loved enough that we can project onto mothers of other babies that bears little relation to the actual experience of that mother and baby. 

Leunig might have meant well but he’s tapped into a process that troubles people deeply.

In doing so, he has fed into the notion that babies need their mother’s in impossible ways, requiring constant vigilance and anything short of this means mothers are bad or certain to traumatise their desperate babies for the rest of their lives. 

Is this ever so? Or is it part of a patriarchal push to keep mothers chained to their role as mothers and not allowing the freedom they need to follow their own intuition about what their babies need? 

My day shall progress beyond this daughter to another who has just moved to a new house and would love some help settling in. And then another daughter needs help collecting a rabbit hutch which she plans to give to a needy family and so it goes. All of us helping one another in imperfect ways. 

Life, like my mess desk and endless efforts at getting order against the tide of ever-present jobs and tasks at hand.  All of it imperfect.