Antarctic vortex

I bought the dog a coat this year to help him with the cold.  Other years it hasn’t felt necessary, at least
not in terms of my identification with him. 
And here, I think about how, on a cold day when I was a child
who refused to wear her jumper, my mother said to me; ‘It makes me cold to look
at you’. 
The roots of empathy perhaps? 
My mother sympathising, only, I did not feel cold at the time.  She felt cold looking at me.
These last several weeks I felt cold looking at the dog. And
so I bought him the best coat I could find at a reasonable price, one that fitted
well and one that was easy enough to put on him. 
Now every morning before his first visit to the garden, I
struggle to get him to cooperate in the wearing of this coat.  He needs to lift one leg at a time to fit
into the separate holes in the front, then I bring up the two sides to join the
fabric across his back and slide in the zip joins. 
This is tricky. 
If I accidentally drop one side and the dog drags a foot out
of its hole, I need to start all over again.
Who’d have thought it would be so hard to dress a dog?  I had wanted something I could slip over his
head, jumper style, something that did not need as much cooperation from
him.  But this was the only one that fitted. 
Although the dog has adjusted to the wearing of this coat by
day when he’s outside in the cold, I suspect he’d rather do with out, though he
seems now to appreciate the warmth it generates.

Or is that me again, me being like my mother, me responding
to my sense of the cold, not his?
My husband says, ‘He’s a dog. 
Dogs can manage all weathers.’ 
Maybe on the farm when my husband was a boy they could.
My daughter says, ‘Small dogs can die when it gets too cold.  They need protection.’ 
In several months time, I will be going off on a short freefall
writing retreat with the wonderful Barbara Turner Vesselago.  I’m looking forward to this time but also
fearful that I will not write to her specifications.  Not as I write for this blog, with its mix of
the ‘show, don’t tell’ variety and a heavy dose of telling, as in authorial
intrusion. 
I’m forever telling you what I think.  It’s a no-no in most writing circles. 
The rule is: keep yourself out of the writing, unless in
disguise.  It’s boring for readers, the
saying goes, ‘Show, don’t tell’.  Let
readers make up their own minds. 
I agree, up to a point. 
But I reckon there’s merit in the other style of writing too, the so-called
diegetic’. 
Don’t be put of by the word. 
It’s a writing style in which the writer speaks to you about what goes
on. WG Sebald for instance, and many others write this way.
Even wonderful writers of the show-don’t-tell variety have
sections wherein the writer paraphrases the action to move the story
along.  It helps with pace.  It’s also necessary because every single
detail cannot be shown.  There are some
things readers need to know if they are to enjoy the action.
Anyhow, I’m fearful of the freefall because it will require I
concentrate hard on the show-don’t-tell stuff, otherwise known as the ‘mimetic’.
Again, don’t be put off by the word. 
These are things I’ve learned about writing over the years.  That they fascinate me is no guarantee
they’ll fascinate you, rather like my mother’s view: Just because she was cold
without a jumper, there’s no guarantee I was.
I had a higher metabolic rate at the time.  I’d have been bouncing around in the garden
not noticing.  But my mother, looking out
on me from the windows of the kitchen where she’d have had the fire on high, would
have been more aware of the contrast between the warmth inside and the temperature
outside.  
When my mother entered her last year of life, she kept her
heater at full bore all day long in winter. To enter her room was to enter a
sauna. She found it pleasant and every time I came in with only a cardigan and
no coat she would tell me off for not dressing warmly enough. 
But I came prepared for her room.
These days, and this winter particularly, I feel the cold in
my own right. 
I’m not alone here. Everyone throughout certain parts of
Australia is complaining of and rejoicing in the fact that we have snow in
Queensland. 
Not for something like fifty years has there been snow in
Queensland. 
They call it the Antarctic vortex.  Which puts me in mind of a comment that JeniMawter made when she handed the fiction prize in the Lane Cove competition last
year to Marjorie Lewis-Jones, ‘Don’t start your story with the weather.’  

I hadn’t realised that. To me, the weather in my story was
simply that, weather at the opposite extreme of what we have now, a hot
stinking summer. 
There you have it.  When
writers talk about the rules of writing they can develop any number of rules to
justify what to do and what not to do. 
I say, ‘do it anyhow’ and see how it works.  If it sounds lumpy and clunky and does not invite
your reader in, then think again.  Maybe
some of these rules – better named guidelines – might help. Bearing in mind, what works for you might not work for the
other.  
Still your ‘feel’ for things is
probably a good place to start.

No breasts allowed

I spent the early hours of this morning dreaming about nipples.  I was at a psychotherapy conference and the
topic was on infant observation, the business of taking time out, an hour a
week for at least a year to observe the earliest days of a baby’s life, most
likely in the company of its mother and/or father. 
The talk had been boring, safe and non-controversial. I
wanted to liven it up with stories.  I
wanted anecdotes or some illustrations of the sorts of things that can happen
to lift the topic away from theoretical abstraction. 
I rehearsed a comment in my head that went along these
lines:  my daughter had painted a picture,
on a huge canvas of a gigantic nipple, a red orb and in its centre a tiny white
spot. 
I knew as soon as I mentioned the word nipple, people would
start to vibrate with the embarrassment of it all.  As if I were using a swear word. 
Nipples in the context of babies are all about nourishment
and survival and there is huge pleasure in that as well as frustration and anxiety
and all the things that go along with disappointing feeds. 
Nipples are also eroticised for the benefits of sexual desire. 
Why this dream?
I saw an image as I flashed through Facebook yesterday of a
muscular man with a so-called six pack who had cut out the nipples from images
of celebrities, one of whom was Beyoncé, the other I can’t remember – one in black and white, the other in colour – and he had pasted these nipples over his own. 
His picture reminded me of the way strippers look when they
paste those little suction caps and tassels over their own nipples when at work.  The sort you see in movies. 
It looked ridiculous and all of this to make the point that Facebook’s
policy on covering up female nipples is hypocritical when it’s okay to put the
male nipple on display. 
I have wondered about this often alongside the furore that erupts
from time to time when breastfeeding mothers are escorted from the premises for
feeding their babies in public. 
No breasts allowed. 
And yet breasts are visible everywhere, in whole or in part,
small or large, floppy or firm. 
Why do female breasts evoke such a passionate response.
I reckon it has to do with those unspoken unrecognised
infantile desires in all of us for a feed, for a mother and for all that those
breasts represent, but I may be wrong here.