Broken rules

In most other ways I looked like any other of those thirty girls confirmed one Sunday in 1966, despite being a whole year older. My fault, I realised too late. When my mother took me shopping for suitable shoes, she let me choose a turquoise pair, complete with pointy toes, foot strap and tiny heels.

Such sophistication. 

The shoes suited me perfectly in the shop but only when we lined up outside the church did I recognise a river of black patents on the girls in white dresses ahead of me.

I also wore the mandatory white dress and satin sash. In that I was no different. The virginal spectacle of a group of mostly twelve-year-old girls who walked up the aisle of the Church of Our Lady of Good Counsel in Deepdene one Sunday morning in spring, with one eyesore at the back, me in my turquoise shoes. 

I could not hide them however much I might have tried, and it taught me a lesson about standing out, and being different. The pain of it all. The way in which something that at one time can seem exhilarating and new, can in the next become a deep source of shame. A humiliation made worse when I saw my former grade six teacher, Mother Mary John, who looked me up and down, her eyes resting for longer than they should at my feet.

At that same moment, less than one full year since I had left the primary school of Our Lady of Good Counsel and gone off to the big girls’ convent, just shy of my thirteenth birthday, I realised how short she had become.

In the space of a year, she had shrunk and had no further power over me. She could look at my feet disapprovingly, but did not say a word. Not as she might have in the past. She had no authority over me anymore. 

This thrilled me with a pleasure greater than any shame I might have experienced at standing out in my turquoise shoes.

I have found throughout life that there are times when swamped with the pain of feeling belittled, there can follow a corresponding burst of pride and growth. As if the sudden shrinkage in my sense of myself is then accompanied by an expansion that runs along the lines: I have slipped as low as I can go in your esteem, but now you have shrunken in mine, too.

Now you can longer hurt me. 

Not that I ever held Mother Mary John in high regard. She was never a teacher who filled my heart with the joy of connection. She, who put boys into empty rubbish bins to stand for hours with a ribbon in their hair after they had misbehaved. And therefore, for some reason I never understood, deserved to be treated as if they were girls. The ribbon in the hair.

It was as if a switch in gender by that simple ribbon marker created an aura of inferiority and shame they would never forget.

Standing the boys in an empty rubbish bin, made sense to me. They could thereby be punished, reduced to rubbish, but the ribbon in their hair, what little hair most ten to twelve-year-old boys of my acquaintance had in those years, made no sense. 

For the most part, this nun’s harsh words of criticism were enough to send me down the tunnel of abjection, but other children might have needed more, even as she ran an orderly ship.

Hands on heads. Hands on desks. Hands visible always, rather as the police taking a person into custody insist their would-be prisoner put their hands into the air. It took me years to understand the police doing so to ensure the trapped person did not whip out a gun.

Such is the life of childhood. A time of mystery and confusion. A time when things make no sense. At the same time things can be so clear in our understanding.

As Maria Tumarkin reckons: kids are sniffer dogs for secrets. We know what’s going on. We know when things are amiss. We can detect a lie or falsehood from a few inches. From ten feet, from across a river.

Religion offers some element of understanding here. It creates a way of viewing the world that is different from the secular upbringings of those who miss out on the mysteries of God. Any god, any religion.

They miss out on the awe and majesty of Heaven. But the secularly raised children will no doubt still find awe in the landscape of plant and animal life and in the mysteries of their people. Their parents, siblings and those who surround them. 

But the comforts and harshness of religion, at least of the religion into which I was born, adds a layer of specialness, rather like my turquoise shoes.

Even as I have travelled through life and met others like me, lapsed Catholics with whom I share a bond of understanding that runs deep. They need to be lapsed though. Those who are still beliers continue to live in the world of mystery that I abandoned in my eighteenth year when I sinned most grievously, and the earth did not swallow me whole. By having sex with a man out of wedlock. The sky did not fall through. And even though I sensed my sin was written into the lines of my face, even my mother did not see how I had changed. 

Soon after, religion lost its thrall.

It’s an easy thing to do. But before you do it, before you break the rules, it feels almost impossible to imagine. Once broken all other, now seemingly arbitrary rules, fall away like so much confetti at a wedding. Only to be swept up and tossed into the bin of memory. New rules might take their place from institutions, for me from the world of psychoanalysis, at least for a time, but these rules are easier by far to break. 

These rules were not introduced to me in childhood. These rules I gleaned from books. These rules needed to make a deeper sense than mere obedience dictated. These rules needed to offer a purpose that I understood.

Until, rather like the rules of grammar of subject, verb and object, the accompanying clauses and phrases we like to chuck around, I learned to break rules to find security in the discordant and re-find the beauty of my twelve-year-old’s turquoise shoes. 

Not a cigar, a cigarette

When there’s a figure of torture seated on the mantelpiece day after day, it shapes your mind in ways that evade description. Like the crucifix from Holland, the one my mother must have packed in her belongings. Something she could not live without.  She needed to live without her parents and other members of her extended family. This crucifix provided certainty. A certainty that runs along the lines: there will always be suffering, and suffering brings with it the rewards of Heaven, if you live a good and unselfish life. 

I had wanted to write about the crucifix on my desk this morning but the more I looked at it, the more appalled I became as I slipped into my childhood mind, the one that daily endured the sight of this thin man stretched out on a cross. Two planks of wood, one shorter than the other. Someone has carved this figure out of wood and painted it with varnish. 

A man whose long arms are stretched into position. One of his arms once snapped and is reglued into its fixed position. One of his hands has worn away, still chipped, so that only the wrist remains stuck to the cross with a thumb nail. The cross rests on a semicircular centre piece in Bakelite which holds it steady. On the back someone has carved the letter and numbers: V498168, as if this piece is a job lot in a museum or has come from an auction room somewhere. 

I know nothing of its provenance or how it came into my parents’ possession, only that this crucifix has accompanied me throughout my childhood from the house into which I was born. Perhaps that’s why I wanted to take it with me from among my mother’s possessions after she died. 

None of my siblings who helped to clear out of my mother’s last bits and pieces soon after her death objected as I thought they might. Was I up to some sacrilegious no good? Or was it some sentimental longing to keep this souvenir from childhood. Why this souvenir, a figure of torture on a crucifix, a bearded man, his head lolling towards his shoulders, no longer able to hold it up? A loin cloth still in place around his hips but otherwise naked?

Two statues sat on the mantelpiece of my childhood, one of Christ crucified as I have described above, the other of his mother Mary, in brown porcelain, a crown on her head. The crown marks her royalty, a crown to mark Christ’s suffering. His was made of thorns.

Not that you can see this clearly, but I know from a childhood full of prayer and religious stories that the soldiers made Christ a crown of thorns by way of mockery. For the king of the Jews. I cannot empathise with the story anymore as it ceases to hold me in thrall as it might once have done. 

I cannot believe any of the religious folklore I grew into and beyond. But on my eighteenth birthday or thereabouts even before a time when eighteen was considered the age of entering adulthood, when we still celebrated 21 as the real coming of age, I saw inside the church and began to doubt that anything the nuns had taught us at school bore any relation to what I now considered truthful. As if scales fell from my eyes and I began to think of all the ritual and pageantry of the church as akin to the stories from the Magic Faraway tree, that tree in the woods which a small tribe of children climbed after mealtimes and beyond. The canopy of leaves in the centre. They enter a fantastical world of other people who are interested in these sweet children so far away from home. The Saucepan Man who rattles pots and pans, Mrs Moon-Face, Dame Washalot and Mr Watizisname, strange creatures but no less real to me then than Jesus Christ is now. The world of make believe and imagination.

Last night I dreamed I sat around the table of my childhood, no longer a child. My father was at the head, and I sat at the opposite end, my sisters and brothers flanked on either side. We talked about sexual behaviour, and I protested that it was akin to rape. 

I tried to explain this notion of rape culture to my family as I took a cigarette from my father’s Craven A filter tipped smokes and lit up. I smoked the cigarette from go to woe and did not enjoy the sensation on my lips, tongue and in my throat. Later in the dream I found myself lighting up another cigarette as my father watched. And again, I was repulsed. 

A question in my mind, why was I doing this? Was this my father in myself? 

It comes to me now as I think about Jesus Christ on the mantelpiece of my childhood home. My brothers nicknamed our father ‘JC’ after his first names, Jan Christiaan, a JC long suffering. 

Whenever my husband, who also struggles under the weight of a Catholic childhood mutters under his voice, half in jest, half as an expression of whatever frustration ails him: ‘My God My God, why hath thou forsaken me?’ I remind him that these are the words of Christ on the cross, dying to atone for the sins of all mankind. Is this what my husband imagines he is doing? Is this how my father saw his lot too. 

There on the crucifix of life, struggling to deal not only with his sins but also his own confused state of mind. For my father who broke the greatest taboo of all, who violated his children in much the way his own father once violated him.

Is this why the crucifix that sits beside me on display adds a layer to the confusion that is me?