Not the staying type

“Like sexual desire, memory never stops. It pairs the dead with the living, real with imaginary beings, dreams with history’ Annie Ernaux

Unlike sexual desire, which is capped by pleasure, memory has its devastating moments when we trawl through the past and rediscover our pain. The dead paired with the living.

In her book, The Years, Ernaux reminds us, over time we will be forgotten. This erasure involves pitching into the future to a time, as in the past, when we did not exist. A sobering thought.

In the January of 1972, my nineteenth year on earth, my sister Claire, and her friend Kris, whom we nicknamed Honey, moved into the back section of a spacious brick Edwardian house in Caulfield near what was then known as the Caulfield Institute of Technology. The section we rented backed onto Royal Parade at the end of a narrow walkway. 

We moved in during the warmth of summer with no idea of how cold the place would get once winter kicked in. We moved there as an escape from life at 336 Warrigal Road in Cheltenham, where my sister and I lived. A double fronted, cream brick veneer, my mother loved because it was brand new and held every promise, for her at least, of a better life. 

As in most stories, this better life did not follow, and my sister and I could not wait to get out once my sister finished her final school year and knew her fate tertiary-study wise.

I was already at university on a cadetship to the health department. They paid me $12.00 a week during my four years of study, on condition I repay them by working for at least two years in a health department facility, most likely a hospital.

The prospect didn’t faze me then. Like the place we rented in the summer when we had no idea of how intolerable winter’s cold could become when a single kerosene heater that stung your eyes and made them water was all we could afford for heat. 

I had no idea a hospital social worker’s life could be so grim, any more than my mother realised within almost minutes of moving into our new home in Cheltenham when my father’s drinking escalated to the point we spent many weekends bunkered down with relatives to protect us from his rages.

Life has a way of turning out differently from how we expect. In the two-bedroom section of our new home on Royal Parade, my sister and I shared the larger bedroom with its one window facing the side footpath and one wardrobe. At night I watched stars through the scrim curtain. 

The shower recess, at the end of a corridor onto which our bedroom backed, led to a broom-cupboard sized bedroom, which Honey occupied. Beyond the corridor, as you made your way to the only exit, you moved through a dark windowless room, which we used as our living area. 

In the centre, we plonked an old blue couch, a hand me down from some friends. Beyond this door the kitchen consisted of a single sink and stove, and room enough for a tiny table and three chairs. Its windows, row upon row of frosted slats. The type you find in toilets which you flicked up in summer for whatever breeze they offered. But the place never became too hot, hidden under the bushes of an ancient garden that must have been there for at least one hundred years. 

Despite its raw ugliness, like the outhouse or woodshed of a grand house, our place became the go-to of all our friends, most of whom still lived at home with their parents.

We spent the night of the election-to-end-all-elections in 1972 when Gough Whitlam finally because our first Labor Prime Minister, stretched across the living room floor on mattresses and inflated Li-los people had brought from home for the long night of celebration.

Those were the times when the young men in our midst, Jack, Neil, Mick, Hurry, Pete, Ernie and Kevin, to name a few, all Saint Bernard’s boys downed beer by the dozen, while we girls guzzled on cheap port mixed with lemonade, or those who were less inclined to sweetness or more health conscious, brought litres of orange juice to mix with vodka. 

I did not have a political bone in my body then but picked up on the fervour of my friends for the Labor Party and for reform for a way beyond the born to rule mentality of those who backed people like Billy McMahon. I followed their lead but could never take on their passion for football. 

Memories come back with all the resilience of the past however much it disappears almost the minute it’s lived. Memories skitter, like the time we watched a football game in Collingwood and later ate pizza in South Yarra, my first taste of pizza beyond an earlier genuine version with my first ever official boyfriend from university. Alex.

Alex sat at a table among a group of his cronies from another Catholic boy’s school somewhere in Preston where he lived with his mother and father. His father ran a concreting business.

A success story. His family lived in a double storey house with a concrete front and back garden. Alex was tall and skinny and to my mind he was gawky. Gomer Pyle gawky. But he liked me. And given no other boy took an interest in me I went along with him to visit his parents, to parties at the Italian Club in Brunswick, to gatherings of his cousins.

Alex introduced me to pizza, thick with a thin topping of tomatoes, basil, and olive oil. Napolitano style, he told me. I disliked its stodge, and lack of topping. 

Alex studied applied engineering and lived in a world so different from my own. But he drove his own car, a grey Falcon and was prepared to travel all the way from Preston to Cheltenham to pick me up for events and to take me home after late nights studying at university. 

Alex was good to me, but I was not so to him. I was dismissive of his overtures and although sexual desire rumbled underneath and Alex and I tried furtive manoeuvres in his car outside my home late at night, we never moved beyond what people described as funny business. 

We wagged university one day on the pretext of travelling to study in the Monash University library and parked in the back of someone’s parking lot where there were plenty of trees and no one to be seen. Alex tried again to offer sexual satisfaction as we listened to Carol King on the radio. The earth did not move under my feet. It stuttered to a halt. 

I disliked Alex’s desperate attempts to pleasure me. His other overtures. He sent me poems, handwritten on paper torn from lined note pads, with his awkward attempts at illustrations. Someone else’s words, because Alex could never find the right ones. 

By the end of that summer Paul returned into my life, fresh from his sojourn to Tocumwal where he had worked in a hotel to get a handle on his future. After a short spell with his parents in Edithvale, Paul moved into an apartment with a friend Ivan. They rented a second floor flat in brown brick where the two men shared cooking and cleaning.

Ivan called me aside at a party one day, ‘He’s not the staying type,’ he said of Paul and for a minute I believed him. 

It was not Paul in the end who was not the staying type, nor Alex. It was me who wandered away from what seemed to me in those days when I could not predict what the future might hold, a grim future ahead with either of these men. 

Sexual desire and memories clash between the living and the dead, to jumble Ernaux’s words, and all we have left are scattered images across the tapestry of our lives. 

Who are you?

‘Peer over the edge of doubt’. Follow the crooked roads, the ones without a destination. 

When I have ‘doubts’ that I might cease to be. Apologies to John Keats. 

I’m moving through the Brontës, Anne’s Tenant of Wildfell Hall and now Emily’s Wuthering Heights. She who died at 30. Hard to imagine these days, a talent snatched away before her prime though in the 1800s your twenties were your prime. Now it’s more your thirties and forties.

There was a time many years ago when the Jungian analyst Peter O’Connor wrote a book on the midlife crisis. My husband considered he was going through one. Just on thirty-five, as I recall, and restless in his public service job. It was time to go back to university, which he did. 

My mid-life crisis happened a few years later, for me at forty. When the analysts decided I was unsuitable to be among them. A tedious topic and one I resist entering as I’ve done it to death over a twelve-year period in an 80,000-word thesis and a book that refuses to see the light of day.

These are my doubts. These doubts whose edge I must peer over.

We’ve passed through the shortest day; the mid-winter equinox and things can only get better now with the slowly increasing daylight. A friend told me, it’s very British to endlessly talk about the weather or to use it as an opener and once at a short story competition awards night, the adjudicator talked about what a mistake it was to begin a story with the weather. Yet so many stories begin with just that. Weather places us in a mood, even if in the blazing heat of summer our hearts can be iced over. 

There’s a professor at George Washington University in America who has come under fire for her concerns about Palestine. Lara Sheehi teaches psychology and feminism, among other things, and is also a psychoanalyst.

A bright cookie you’d say and lovely to look at from the YouTube clips I’ve watched. Her wavy dark hair spilling from the top of her head like the luxuriant branches of a tree. Bright and vibrant eyes. 

Sheehi’s been accused of taking the relational turn and considering the world of the social too far within psychoanalytic circles, by placing what one man calls activism at its centre. The old freedom warrior argument, but more, she’s been accused of being antisemitic. 

Her university investigated the claims of a couple of Jewish students who took her to task after what Sheehi describes as a ‘brown bag’, an informal conversation held after class. It was not part of her teaching. But something in the conversation led these students to consider Sheehi antisemitic. They lodged a complaint.

The university investigated and found Sheehi not guilty, but the president of one of the prestigious psychoanalytic institutes in America who tried to stop ‘activism’ from entering the discussion of psychoanalytic concerns has resigned in the backlash he copped over his leadership. And that was that.

Doer-done-to and the furore to follow. 

I tell myself I must not take sides, or even think about it as a question of side taking, but here I am. I find myself supporting Sheehi’s position just as I support the position of trans activists who are likewise accused of being too zealous in their attempts to stifle those who might seek to stifle them.

The conservative element calls for conversation, but does not see that in certain conversations there are implicit assumptions loaded with microaggressions and ongoing abuse.

Like the idea of trans women infiltrating the women’s toilets and change rooms for the purpose of assaulting other women. As if trans women are still men in disguise.

This is an abuse of transwomen, and refusal to acknowledge they are no longer men. Besides, men don’t need to disguise themselves as women to abuse other women. They’ve been doing it for centuries without disguise. 

It’s hard to get your mind around the idea that someone might be born in a body that clashes with their sense of themselves and that over time against the injunctions of the society and families into which they were born, such people might seek to shift the order of things to better match their sense of themselves.

The ’unruly I’, as Jeannine Ouellette calls it.

You are who you think you are. Or you are not. You are who other people think you are. 

You are all manner of things. But your sense of yourself, whatever identity you lay claim to internally, must account for something, even if others might challenge it. And you might challenge it yourself. 

Peer over the edge of your doubts. Onto a clump of mistletoe hacked from our tree. Mistletoe is a parasite and does little harm when contained. Pigeon carriers for seeds. But sometimes they become creatures with sinewy arms that will swallow you whole.  Colonisers.