Olive trees, white paint, and a pandemic

We have two olive trees in our back garden, in pots. One has its first black olive ever, the other is dead. It fell over too many times in the wind, slipped adrift and with its roots too often exposed to the winds, could not muster the strength it needed to survive. 

It’s still outside in the garden on its side. I haven’t the heart to remove it. Besides there are tiny green bits of moss that have rooted around the surface that please me. 

I like to be reminded that life and death coexist. As if I need reminding in the middle of a pandemic. 

I have a friend and every time we talk on the phone she says, let’s not talk about the pandemic. But invariably, towards the end of the conversation, one or other of us will slip in some question about which hand sanitiser to buy, what mask to wear or what do you think of the new rules?

The new rules that bind us to our homes as never before. It’s tedious because it’s everywhere. Ubiquitous. As ubiquitous as the time in my life when I served carrots with almost every meal to the point my husband now calls carrots ‘ubiquitous’.

It’s part of the human condition to talk about the things that ail us; the things that surround us; the things that make us happy, sad or otherwise. Our health, the weather, whatever viral theme floats along in the online world, including this pandemic. 

Until it happened, we could not have cared less. But now. Wow. Now we pay attention because our lives depend upon it.

In like manner, I find myself irritated by my generation’s frequent conversations about how much we’re relying on the digital world these days, for our work, for our human connections. As if it needs further analysis. 

Perhaps it does because it’s a change and change needs attention. But it’s hard to get to grips with what things mean when we’re in the middle of them. 

I watched a movie last night about the artist L.S. Lowry, about the life he led caring for his lonely, sad mother in Pendlebury, Lancashire. A woman who could not get over the fact that she was not living the life she’d imagined she’d live, a quality life away from Pendlebury so lose by the mills in the early 1930s when she saw herself as made of superior stuff. 

Disappointed in her husband; she was disappointed as well in her son, despite his paintings, which to her were so much wasted space. Except for one painting of yachts that her son had painted for her many years earlier. Not until a neighbour admired the yachts, a woman Mrs Lowry also admired because she wore fine clothes and was a kindred spirit. Until this woman admired Lowry’s painting, his mother saw his work as without merit. 

‘Underneath every picture is the colour white,’ Lowry said. White, blank, open and empty. ‘I paint what I see,’ he said. ‘I paint what I feel.’ Such simple notions from a man who painted sublime images against much opposition, in the absence of his father who left little but debts and his over-demanding mother whom Lowry spent all his time trying to please.

There’s something tragic about these stories of children who can never leave a parent’s side. A son who grows up at home and never leaves. Never finds a partner of his own, always wedded to his mother. 

It gets to me, unsettles me, especially when it’s obvious this mother is working to keep her son glued to her by two things:

One, her constant insistence he must never leave her. She needs his care.

And the other, her constant undermining of his goodness and capacity. 

Parental envy of children is insidious, and it happens more often than we like to admit, literally and figuratively. 

During this pandemic for instance. The older generations lamenting the fact that we only have technology to hold us together and an insistence that it’s an inferior medium from what we enjoyed in days gone by. 

Inferior to the radio and newsprint. Inferior to the television even.

Why must everything be digital? some lament. And decry the young folks who swim around in their digital soup with ease comfort and satisfaction.

It’s not good for their brain development, they insist. They won’t be able to write by hand. They’ll lose all those basic skills. They won’t be able to read a map. 

The list of all the things the young won’t be able to do is endless. When in truth they wheel around us online with such alacrity, it’s breathtaking.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not all wondrous good in the digital world, the world of spammers and scams, the world of fake news, the virtual in preference to the so called real, but my goodness, it’s here now. 

It’s here to stay and we getter get used to it.

For one thing, this pandemic has forced us to face our need to slow down, to stop hopping over the world like minions following one another on the trips of our lifetimes or tripping over to London for a half-day business meeting. 

One thing the digital world has allowed is a way of negotiating our distances while reducing our fat footprints, and at the same time keeping us closer together.

And yes, like everyone, I too miss the actual presence of my children, the people with whom I work, and friends, the comfort of being in a room with real people.

This will return but our digital life will not go away and long may it live until the next revolution in evolution comes our way and we begin to rely on other methods to survive in a world that increasingly needs our help to reduce our impact. 

Otherwise, like the parasites we are, we will overcome our host planet, expose our roots to wind and rain, go back to the basic colour white of Lowry’s pictures, or the bare-rooted tragedy of my olive tree and die out.

3 thoughts on “Olive trees, white paint, and a pandemic”

  1. We watched ‘Mrs Lowrey and Son’ on the the same evening as you Elisabeth. Vanessa Redgrave was magnificent because I wanted to strangle her when I wasn’t feeling sad about her mental poverty – stuck in that loop of anguish and regret. It was utterly stifling, so I cheered myself up afterwards by googling LS Lowry and discovered that he blossomed following his mother’s death in 1939. He lived alone for another 30 plus years and was apparently a quirky, mischievous man who enjoyed new friendships and sustained them until his death. I felt much better after reading that.
    Although technology often defeats me, I’m in love with the gift that is Google. Instant facts, tempting links and supports – it’s a privilege. Unbelievable that we once reserved library books, waited weeks till they were available, then travelled to collect them – just to research a couple of facts.
    You raised many issues in this post and the virus/parasite/host cycle is disturbingly accurate too. But Covid is slowing us down and limiting our greedy trampling of the planet, so we’re fortunate having technology at this time, even if it’s perplexing.

  2. I googled Lorey after the film, too, Sally and like you, I was pleased that he led a much more fulfilling life than the one his mother had allowed. And like you, I relish the ease with which we can explore the ‘facts’ available to us these days via Google and wiki pages. But of course, we have to be thoughtful about said facts. Though it’s easy enough to establish whether or not they’re bogus. Thanks, Sally.

  3. The digital world is like any other. My mother said the world would be a wonderful place without people and she would’ve extended that to the digital one too I have no doubt. People ruin things. When I first typed the word “poetry” into a search engine, probably Lycos, about twenty-five years ago the word that came to my mind was “home” and for a while that feeling remained. For the first time I had direct access to people like me, people who didn’t accept I wrote poetry but expected me to write it and wanted to read it. All my life I couldn’t understand why no one around me was remotely creative because I didn’t feel like I was me unless I was writing words or music or painting and, if I’d had more confidence, I would’ve probably had a crack at dancing too. And for a while it was wonderful but then it started to become work and then hard work and I could see the same happening to others. I thought I didn’t miss the small talk and just hanging out with mates but it seems there is and should be a place for that in relationships if you expect them to grow and become meaningful. Trying to get to know people online proved became a chore and so most people moved to Facebook and pretty much stopped trying. Now I don’t feel at home online. It’s a tool just like Word or Excel.

    The Internet ruined friendship. No one can maintain hundreds of “friendships” and I really hate how Facebook turned “befriend” into simply “friend”. Isn’t it so much nicer to say, “Will you be my friend?” than “Will you friend me?” It’s really horrible because it was because of the Internet I got to discover all those like-minded souls but the mechanism to maintain and develop those relationships failed. I’ve never used Skype or anything similar. Not sure I’d like it. I’d fear I’d feel the need to perform for the camera, to be interesting, to entertain. I loathe chat. The pressure! I liked blogs and having time to frame a response but the problem there is I take so damn long on my replies. I’ve easily spent over an hour on this so far over two days and a part of me wants to dump everything bar the first two sentences and start again. But that’s the perfectionist in me. I do like a considered response.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *