Authenticity lies in the will to dare

There is a place where spiders knit, and fingers skitter across the keyboard.

A place reserved for memory and imagination when anything is possible, and boundaried only by the edges of sentences and their meaning.

I go there on mornings to spend my time dipping into the well of the past and there I find all manner of pleasurable entertainment, jammed against the ghosts of traumas past and the joys of sweet success.

All of them rub together. Writing is a plunge into the unknown in one person’s mind as long as they do not try too hard, at least not at first. At first they must improvise, as George Saunders writes, otherwise if they’re too intentional, the story sounds tired and inauthentic.

Authenticity lies in the will to dare.

In 1977 Dr J Peter Bush published Rape in Australia. The title letters in yellow against a black background with the subtitle ‘an appraisal of attitudes, victims, assailants, medicine and the law’. He was police surgeon at the time and therefore in a good position to see the hideous aftermath of rape and write accordingly.

The cover image in white, the symbol for woman cracked in half. To demonstrate the force of rape as an attack on a person’s identity. Most often a woman’s identity.

My mother gave me this book when I was in my late thirties as a birthday gift. I was appalled by her choice. She must have found the book in a bargain bin somewhere. That’s how my mother bought books, by the kilo. Romantic histories by the boot load for herself, along with anything by well-known Catholic writers as Graham Green and theologians like Teilhard de Jardin who spoke on the philosophy, history, and theories of her religion. She read the The Advocate every Sunday after Mass with religious devotion. She stuck to her faith.

My mother bought me this book, I imagined because I was a social worker then and social workers, at least in her mind, took an interest in such matters. Not that my mother did not care, but rape had not touched her so closely, or so she believed even as her husband had raped her eldest daughter when she was still a child. But my mother who knew this would not have considered it so. 

Incest was something different.

I have read the stories of Alice Munro, now doing the rounds. They speak to the horror of Munro’s ongoing knowledge that her daughter, Andrea Skinner, as a nine-year-old was sexually abused by her stepfather, Gerry Fremlin, Munro’s second husband and still Munro refused to leave him. Just as my mother failed to leave my father.

We writers go into such territory. We circle our wounds as Siri Hustvedt describes returning once more to the place in our unconscious that bristles with energy, the agony, and the desire. the pain and the pleasure, those energy points of human experience that rock us to our core.

Do not underestimate the power of the unconscious mind to evoke memories of matters otherwise dormant.

Like Munro, my mother stayed with her husband after she knew the ugly truth of his behaviour. But unlike Munro, or as far as we know, my mother told my father, ‘If you do this again, if you come here again, I’ll kill you.’ This when she caught my father lurched over my sister in bed. ‘Her eyes like a little bird’s,’ my mother told me years later, ‘with the blankets pulled up to her chin’.

But my father did return again and again even as my mother believed, wanted to believe, it had stopped.

How do you live with such knowledge?

Is this why she gave me the book? An unspoken acknowledgement of something she believed was of my concern because it was also her concern.

Germaine Greer at a conference in Melbourne talked about the ubiquity of rape throughout the suburbs of Melbourne every night with what she imagined were countless women unable to resist their husband’s approaches for sex.

Rape, Greer called it, and there was no protest from her audience, even as her talk was gate crashed by a trans gender activist who argued Greer was guilty of writing off a whole element in society of people who claimed a different identity from the one in which they were born

Greer spent her lifetime trying to give voice to the feminine body and here was someone who dared to suggest, although they were born with a masculine body, they could after a lifetime of privilege, convert into female form.

Greer is mistaken in the idea any trans person has endured a lifetime of privilege. It is not a privilege to enter the world in a body whose form dictates the way you’re treated for the rest of your life, whether as woman or as man.

If you believe, as some do, that the body into which you were born does not feel right for you along all the dimensions we humans have constructed for our two basic genders, then why not protest? Why not seek to find some physical form that fits your sense of your identity?

There are many who would say, you can’t because it’s impossible.

They argue you cannot take on a form of body that is not yours to begin with. People cannot sprout wings and even if we wanted, they say, though we have come close in other ways with hang gliders, aeroplanes, parachutes. All of them attempts to fly.

Even as the human body has long been one we have modified. With all manner of accoutrements, and under the knife. The engravings of some tribes in New Zealand and Africa. The skin piercings of indigenous peoples, even our pierced ears and the popularity of tattoos today. All methods of bodily enhancement.

And in this time of crazy ears and polarities, it’s worth remembering David Whyte: 

You act as though you’re alone, when even the soap dish enables you, writes

the poet, or words to this effect.

They call it the narcissism of small differences. Small or large they can make for conflict with its never-ending cycle of hurt. We see so much of this today. Time to get beyond our differences. To share the vast resources of our world and make room for one another. 

Talk about bodies

It’s a long time since I endured the blood trickle of a period. That event we learn about before we enter womanhood, usually from experience even as we are warned ahead: one day it will happen to you. 

I was late to the party, fifteen years old. It had bothered me for twelve months earlier because my elder sister alerted me to its existence after an aunt with whom we stayed one weekend suggested we go to the beach for a swim. My sister declined, and my aunt asked, ‘Do you have your period?’ 

The word ‘period’ baffled me. It shuddered in my ears. I’d heard of periods from my sister’s attendance at secondary school where she talked of blocks of time in which different subjects were taught, but this was different. So, back home, I asked her its meaning. Her explanation left me little but my imaginary wonderings. 

Soon after I woke one night, went to the toilet and there in the dark I imagined a great dark stain at my pyjama’s crotch. It was a false alarm and when it finally happened, again another night, I went to my sister for support. These were not things I could discuss with my mother. My sister handed me a tampon box and urged me to read the directions. I did not know then I had a vagina, nor where it was located. In my family we did not use such words for genitals. Nor did we hear the word penis bandied about. Certainly not vulva or labia. These parts of our bodies were secrets. 

My vagina, this foreign hole, somewhere between my legs I knew, and somewhere close to my anus. But where? Even as I write these things a chill sets in, a yuk. How can you write about such things? They are unseemly. 

Recently at a seminar on misogyny, Michaela Chamberlain talked about gendered blood and the way women’s bodies get policed. All aspects of misogyny and how to fight a perspective that dominates our lives and seeps into our bones from earliest days. 

I doubt men are much better at talking about their bodies and the changes to them as they enter adolescence and old age: the wet dreams, nocturnal emissions – if that’s the word. In later years, an inability to get an erection, or other aspects as when a young boy’s voice breaks and an Adam’s apple appears at his throat.

But I suspect if they don’t, it’s because adolescent changes and the ravages of age, bespeak a certain vulnerability which men meet with coming-of-age events: the tough training run; a few nights out camping alone. Whatever rituals they can devise, to harden their bodies on the way to manhood, and later onto death. Or else into denial 

Whereas we girls endured no such experience. Still, we also needed to be hardened for life. So many things on the road ahead and no one ever talked about it. The way period cramps can be torture. Not that they ever hurt me, nor my mother or sisters, from what I understand. Looking back, I wonder whether this is also about a disavowal of our bodies. 

In my childhood household, besides the unseemly arrival of our periods, which in later years my sisters and I called Charlie, like the perfume, we did not speak about it. 

The night of that first encounter with a tampon, I misjudged and shoved it up my anus. The discomfort in my spine as I lay in bed later thinking something had to be wrong was overwhelming. I reported back to my sister who was trying to sleep. She sighed. ‘You’ll have to learn one day and I’m not about to show you.’ The thought of my sister fiddling with my bits below put me off. ‘Try these,’ she said handing me a pad and suspender belt. 

The belt was easy and the pad self-evident. But it took many years before I located my vagina and dared to use tampons, well after someone else, a man, found my vagina and penetrated it. After which I entered the realms of womanhood. 

All this a secret to everyone, even to myself. 

How do we escape from the tyranny of the past that says we cannot speak of these things? These bodily excrescences that hint at our vulnerability. 

Even when I was a child in love with television series like The Brady Bunch and The Swiss Family Robinson, I could not understand why no one left to visit a toilet on screen. They might use the bathroom or on their deserted island take a dip in the sea to clean their face and hands, put on makeup, but they never spoke of a need to relieve themselves. 

Michaela Chamberlain talked about Freud’s case of Dora. A young woman whose father brought her to see the great doctor for help with hysterical symptoms. Her loss of voice, choking, migraines, difficulties breathing. 

Freud writes her story as the case of a failed analysis and ascribes the problems to her resistance, and his failure to deal with the transference. Her refusal to use the couch. Her decision to leave abruptly after 18 sessions. 

No wonder she left. She had told Freud her story. When she was fourteen, a family friend, Herr K sexually propositioned her. And then repeatedly at sixteen and again, she believed with her father’s knowledge. Freud ascribed her struggles to jealousy of her father’s lover Frau K and Dora’s desire for her father. Freud twisted the narrative. 

The good old Oedipal Conflict, which I imbibed in my early years of psychotherapy training as if drinking mother’s milk. But there’s something in the business of jealousy, I know from experience. My aching jealousy of others whose achievements within the writing world are greater than my own, and when I was young, my jealousy towards a younger sister who was more beautiful than me alongside my brother, seventeen months older, who was so clever. The family genius. 

Sandwiched between both, with neither brains nor beauty, the past assaulted me like a sledgehammer of self-loathing. But when one of my early therapists suggested I wanted my father for myself, as if I was in love with him, I refused to oblige. Like Dora. He had it wrong. 

I did not want my father any more than Dora wanted hers. These fathers who betrayed us. Who used our bodies and minds for their own comfort, and sexual desire. Who could not find what they wanted in their wives, sexual satisfaction that was built on a misogynistic and patriarchal view of the world that urges women to stay in their places as receptacles for men’s desires, for the penis and whatever else they might want to put inside. 

In another book on misogyny, Kate Manne’s Down Girl, I read about the 2014 Isla Vista killings. A young man, Elliot Rodger, enraged that no women took an interest in him, murdered as many men and women he could locate on a university campus and beyond as a way of assuaging his rage. He aimed his weapons from his BMW. He would show them how wrong they were before he crashed his car and shot himself in the head.  

He is a hero for the craziness of Incels who see themselves as victims of rejection because no woman wants to gratify their desires. The fault of women, of all women. This then is the essence of misogyny, and we learn it early. It’s in our blood. Even women fall victim to its thrall. We pander to our men like they’re small boys in need of love, instead of demanding they pull their weight. Insist they take a greater share in parenting.

I recognise it. My tendency to care, especially for men. When I was in my first significant relationship with a man I adored, I took to ironing his shirts as a way of winning his love. I cleaned his flat every Saturday from floor to ceiling. I scraped out his toilet and vacuumed his floors simply to satisfy my belief this was a way to his love. This was my job. This he’d find irresistible and love me for it. 

The pleasure of his pleasure overruled my own and I did not consider the boredom of housework or the loneliness of those Saturdays at home alone cleaning his flat while he was away at the races. And when he came home, whether he won or lost, we would take to his bed for peremptory sex. It satisfied something in him while for me it was not so different from the housework, only I could doze if there was time later. 

Across the map of time this was what a good relationship looked like to me then. And as much as I see it differently now, I’m still bogged down by the urge to do the lion’s share of housework. My duty to clean and wash; my job to tackle the dust as it piles on every surface. Only these days I let it settle. 

Life has a way of needing more than just submission to another’s wishes. It’s time to make room for all of us as humans. Not bogged down by gender divides that are as false as they are constructed.