Authenticity lies in the will to dare

There is a place where spiders knit, and fingers skitter across the keyboard.

A place reserved for memory and imagination when anything is possible, and boundaried only by the edges of sentences and their meaning.

I go there on mornings to spend my time dipping into the well of the past and there I find all manner of pleasurable entertainment, jammed against the ghosts of traumas past and the joys of sweet success.

All of them rub together. Writing is a plunge into the unknown in one person’s mind as long as they do not try too hard, at least not at first. At first they must improvise, as George Saunders writes, otherwise if they’re too intentional, the story sounds tired and inauthentic.

Authenticity lies in the will to dare.

In 1977 Dr J Peter Bush published Rape in Australia. The title letters in yellow against a black background with the subtitle ‘an appraisal of attitudes, victims, assailants, medicine and the law’. He was police surgeon at the time and therefore in a good position to see the hideous aftermath of rape and write accordingly.

The cover image in white, the symbol for woman cracked in half. To demonstrate the force of rape as an attack on a person’s identity. Most often a woman’s identity.

My mother gave me this book when I was in my late thirties as a birthday gift. I was appalled by her choice. She must have found the book in a bargain bin somewhere. That’s how my mother bought books, by the kilo. Romantic histories by the boot load for herself, along with anything by well-known Catholic writers as Graham Green and theologians like Teilhard de Jardin who spoke on the philosophy, history, and theories of her religion. She read the The Advocate every Sunday after Mass with religious devotion. She stuck to her faith.

My mother bought me this book, I imagined because I was a social worker then and social workers, at least in her mind, took an interest in such matters. Not that my mother did not care, but rape had not touched her so closely, or so she believed even as her husband had raped her eldest daughter when she was still a child. But my mother who knew this would not have considered it so. 

Incest was something different.

I have read the stories of Alice Munro, now doing the rounds. They speak to the horror of Munro’s ongoing knowledge that her daughter, Andrea Skinner, as a nine-year-old was sexually abused by her stepfather, Gerry Fremlin, Munro’s second husband and still Munro refused to leave him. Just as my mother failed to leave my father.

We writers go into such territory. We circle our wounds as Siri Hustvedt describes returning once more to the place in our unconscious that bristles with energy, the agony, and the desire. the pain and the pleasure, those energy points of human experience that rock us to our core.

Do not underestimate the power of the unconscious mind to evoke memories of matters otherwise dormant.

Like Munro, my mother stayed with her husband after she knew the ugly truth of his behaviour. But unlike Munro, or as far as we know, my mother told my father, ‘If you do this again, if you come here again, I’ll kill you.’ This when she caught my father lurched over my sister in bed. ‘Her eyes like a little bird’s,’ my mother told me years later, ‘with the blankets pulled up to her chin’.

But my father did return again and again even as my mother believed, wanted to believe, it had stopped.

How do you live with such knowledge?

Is this why she gave me the book? An unspoken acknowledgement of something she believed was of my concern because it was also her concern.

Germaine Greer at a conference in Melbourne talked about the ubiquity of rape throughout the suburbs of Melbourne every night with what she imagined were countless women unable to resist their husband’s approaches for sex.

Rape, Greer called it, and there was no protest from her audience, even as her talk was gate crashed by a trans gender activist who argued Greer was guilty of writing off a whole element in society of people who claimed a different identity from the one in which they were born

Greer spent her lifetime trying to give voice to the feminine body and here was someone who dared to suggest, although they were born with a masculine body, they could after a lifetime of privilege, convert into female form.

Greer is mistaken in the idea any trans person has endured a lifetime of privilege. It is not a privilege to enter the world in a body whose form dictates the way you’re treated for the rest of your life, whether as woman or as man.

If you believe, as some do, that the body into which you were born does not feel right for you along all the dimensions we humans have constructed for our two basic genders, then why not protest? Why not seek to find some physical form that fits your sense of your identity?

There are many who would say, you can’t because it’s impossible.

They argue you cannot take on a form of body that is not yours to begin with. People cannot sprout wings and even if we wanted, they say, though we have come close in other ways with hang gliders, aeroplanes, parachutes. All of them attempts to fly.

Even as the human body has long been one we have modified. With all manner of accoutrements, and under the knife. The engravings of some tribes in New Zealand and Africa. The skin piercings of indigenous peoples, even our pierced ears and the popularity of tattoos today. All methods of bodily enhancement.

And in this time of crazy ears and polarities, it’s worth remembering David Whyte: 

You act as though you’re alone, when even the soap dish enables you, writes

the poet, or words to this effect.

They call it the narcissism of small differences. Small or large they can make for conflict with its never-ending cycle of hurt. We see so much of this today. Time to get beyond our differences. To share the vast resources of our world and make room for one another. 

Talking to my enemies

‘You make peace by talking to your enemies’, or so the saying goes. To overcome your conflict, you must address them with those who hold the differences. It links to what Sebastian Smee reflects as ‘the morally troubled relationship between the stories we tell and the lives we lead, or are led by.’ 

These words in an essay exploring the divide between Alice Munro and her daughter Andrea, who was sexually abused as an eight-year-old by the man Alice brought into their lives. A man who treated both badly, while the child copped the greatest fall out and the mother wrote award winning stories about relationships, between troubled children, women and men. 

If parents are our moral compass at least in childhood before we’re old enough to grasp the significance of our own set of rules for how to love, then they too can lead us astray. The hypocrisy we endure daily within ourselves and beyond. 

I miss my correspondence with Gerald Murnane who sacked me two years ago. The way I could write to him when all else failed. And another friend now to whom I sometimes write. But both these once beloved people have shifted in my esteem and I in theirs. For years we wrote to one another but over time those differences sprang up like weeds choking our otherwise lively correspondence. Both finding me too different from them, as I have found them. In our politics, our sensibilities, our world views.

Gerald Murnane sacked me after he wrote me his last letter. We belong to different tribes, he wrote. And my other friend has suggested instead of our reliable and consistent Sunday stories, consistent at least from my end, hers were peripatetic, we write when the urge hits us.

And this is what has happened it seems for her. For me the urge to write hits often and I have sent several missives her way, but she takes so long to reply, if at all, that I’m left wondering whether I’m writing to a ghost. 

I have written about letter writing in the past. The way my mother wrote letters to those who lived on the other side of the world, her beloved father, siblings and cousins whom she left behind when she migrated to Australia. And then when her children reached adulthood and left home, even as we could visit one another in person, she took to writing letters to us.

My mother wrote to me whenever there was conflict between us and whenever she was avoiding it. She did not like my moral compass after I left her care and her church. She did not like my attraction to psychoanalysis. A heathen practice she considered dangerous following on from her limited understanding of Freud and his take on sexuality. Or her version thereof.

She did not relish my promiscuous ways in my early twenties before I met the man I married. She did not like me ‘living in sin; with my first ever boyfriend. She did not like my attitude to all things modern and contemporary in the world, my profligate tastes in music and clothes and people.

She wished she could have the same impact on me as a young adult as she held over me as a child. And how I wish in some ways I could have gone on loving her in that same unadulterated way as when I was a child. When my mother was my sun and moon and stars and basically she could do no wrong. She was my best ally. The person whose attitudes and ideas stood for me as representative of the best person in the world, until she was not. 

It crept up gradually reinforced when I fell in love with my favourite teacher in secondary school. A nun and as repressed I imagine as my inhibited mother, but a woman of the world in my convent. At least she had a deeper understanding than the other nuns who taught us and I came to see her as the one person in the world for whom my heart beat fast until I fell foul of her. 

Two reasons: one she befriended my younger sister who turned to her even more than me, and two, I went to university where I encountered my first taste of the opposite sex. No longer for me any desires to enter a convent and spend my life chaste and without desire. I began to recognise something of the carnal pleasures of closeness to boys and men and I could not go back to my convent ways.

Then my desires flipped in the direction of my first serious boyfriend, his seeming unattainability that morphed into a steady relationship for four years. With him I lived in sin much to my mother’s horror but my love for him paled over time after I began to work as a social worker in Prince Henry’s hospital and he began to pursue a proper career beyond gambling. I had planned to support his education after he had supported mine, but by the time I entered the world of work and met other people from other walks of life I shifted my allegiances. 

I can see a pattern here.

Every time I moved places in my life, I met other people and my original connections faded. No wonder I prefer to stay put. It’s safer. Though over the decades as much as I have lived in this same house since 1980 and stayed married to the same man I married three years earlier, I have strayed and others in my world have strayed. Friends who were once close have drifted away or I drifted from them. Friends I met through my work come and go. Though there are a few who last the test of time though none since my childhood in adulthood except my husband who entered my life when I was 23. And my children. Family my siblings. These are the people who stay in my life however much distance might come between us. We never entirely drop out of ne another’s lives. We never entirely fade from one another. 

For such is the nature of life and love and friendship. At least in my life. I’m always in search of deeper connections. But I’ve yet to learn how to negotiate my way through the morass of these gnarly differences that invariably creep into all our relationships over time. How to talk to my enemies, rather than take them on.