Wounds on trees

‘The sinister pedantry of therapy. Its suggestion that somehow life was reparable. That here existed a societal norm and that the patient was being guided towards it.’ Hanya Yanagihara.

Elsewhere Yanagihara writes about ‘the still life of a dead family’. Grim thoughts with which to begin my day.

I disagree with the first notion. Therapy as repair. Therapy as conformity. My version runs more long the lines of Freud’s initial suggestion: Therapy might help a person move from overwhelming misery in life to more bearable misery. 

It’s a modest claim, even as Freud, the man, seemed anything but modest, to me at least. He had his grandiosities. 

Don’t we all. Our determinations. Our hopes and dreams.

As for the dead family in still life, I can picture such a family. The family that lives on the surface while underneath all manner of brutality occurs, particularly to the children. And their root system rots.

Wounds on trees

Where branches have been torn off in storms or fallen under the woodchopper’s axe. Wounds that leak sap as an antidote to bleeding. Some type of coagulation of the inner sap to help such amputations to heal. Into burls. 

A wood turner’s delight. All those veined synapses in the wood. Tree branches as arms to support the leaves and stabilize the root system underground. A tree without branches has little chance of growth.

A memory slips in. During my twenty third year I rented a flat, one of two, within a rambling singe storey dwelling on Burke Road in Camberwell. At the top of the hill close by Canterbury Road and St Marks Anglican church. A solid brick residence stuccoed in battleship grey behind a broad front garden of grass and woody plants, including a spreading jacaranda which shielded the house from the street. 

Inside was dark and needed lights on all year round. Two bedrooms to one side, in one of which we slept. The room closest to the back with a wide window and wardrobe space and the other smaller, closer to the front but with the tiniest windows. We used it mainly for storage. 

The kitchen through which you entered by the back door was pokey with a small stove, room for a fridge and few cupboards almost no bench space to speak of more like a boat galley and around the corner a spacious loungeroom with the one wide window in the house. 

Even so it too was gloomy given the overhanging trees lining the front garden. There was also a pond void of fish but replete with water weeds.

My memories of this place, even at the height of summer when the equinox blazed brightly were of inner darkness. There was a narrow gravel driveway to one side where I parked my white VW and my husband-to-be his blue Renault. And a garage that was locked. 

Just as well it would have been a nuisance to open those clanking doors, where the once grey paint peeled to reveal the bare grey of aged boards. This garage was an aberration. 

We lived in this flat over a year before the landlord sent us a letter, via the agent, to tell us they were about to sell and we needed to move out.

That day in the front garden. Oh the costumery.

Memories are piling in now thick and fast.

The first when I was in the front garden one day in the weeks before our decision to marry when I thought of visiting my mother. Only I felt no desire to do so. My father was still alive. He had stopped drinking and he and my mother lived in quiet contentment, or seemingly so.

My father had started back at the church and shared in bible study with my mother. 

The idea made me cringe. But it was better than drunken abuse. Still, there’s not much worse than a reformed alcoholic, one who has found God. 

Not that my father espoused the virtues of God. He kept his religious views to himself. I’ll never know whether my mother put pressure on him to re-cement her faith or his. He had become a Catholic some forty years earlier to marry her. No mixed marriages allowed. And then, soon after his death when my mother chose to marry another man who came into her life, she urged him to renew his Catholic vows. 

To be close to my mother, it seemed, you needed to believe.

I could not believe. Not as I once held fast to those ideas when a child. My faith was rotten. Eaten out by my late adolescent conviction it was all poppycock. It made little sense and kept us in thrall to a God – if he did indeed exist – who seemed capricious at best, cruel at worst. Life to me was more complex than religion suggested. 

The thought my mother might be hurt if I did not visit that weekend as I had promised. But the thought of visiting hit me hard, and in the end I made some feeble excuse as to why we could not come.

It set in train a process of thought in my mind about a sensation I had experienced all my life. The sense I needed to look after my mother. That she relied on me to make her happy. That she was deeply unhappy despite her religion and only I could rectify her sorrow.

After I left home this thought softened as we were separate at last but every so often it rose and grabbed me by the neck. A choking sensation as if I had let her down and she would be devastated at the loss of my allegiance. 

I understood she was upset at my abandonment of religion but as with most things we did not talk about it.

The thing I remember most clearly about my relationship with my mother throughout our shared adulthood, we rarely, if ever, talked. Only once, after I sent her a piece of my writing which I had called Night Terrors

I sent it to her through snail mail. She rang me soon after and suggested we talk.

She was married by then to her second husband and seemingly happier than she had ever been when married to my father. So, we arranged I should visit one lunch time. We could talk after we ate, once my stepfather had gone off for his usual afternoon nap. My mother did not want him to join the conversation. She did not want him to know.

The lunch was cordial, and we talked of the usual nothings, only after Gordon closed the door behind him did I feel the relief of finally letting my mother know something of my childhood experience and she in her turn acknowledging,

‘The things your father did to me’. She did not elaborate and to this day, I’m still guessing. 

On childhood abuse

It’s ‘impossible to explain to the healthy the logic of the sick.’ Hanya Yanagihara

So we understand from Jude St Francis, a man in his mid-thirties crippled with a disabled spine following a serious car accident in which he nearly lost his life. But that’s not the half of it in his Little Life, along with that of his three close friends, JB, Malcolm and Willem. All of them dogged by life’s troubles, mid twentieth century, but none more so than Jude. 

To read this book is to venture into the world of trauma and child abuse full on. 

We are privy not only to what Jude experiences at the hands of the cruel monks who raised him, presumably in a Franciscan monastery, and gave him his name, as an abandoned baby left beside a dumpster to freeze to death. 

The story continues in sequential flashbacks that pile one on top of the other, of abuse upon abuse inflicted on this young man throughout his early years. We get glimpses of his initial attempts to cope through tantrums and rage, which are only met with more punishment into an adult hood of self-cutting and other deprivations all hopelessly designed to rid him of the burden of his childhood experience. 

His constant insistence he has done bad, unspeakable things when we know that he was subjected to appalling cruelties on his young person. We can see the way they get confused even in his so-called happy times. 

This is not a book for people who can’t tolerate the imagined feel of a knife through the skin, the blade edging deeper, and the blood. There are times when I find myself groaning out loud at the horror of it all. But persevere I must. As persevere we all must in our own little lives, hopefully none as horrific as Jude’s. Though I know that’s unlikely.

Jude is a man who values friendship but is unable to use it fully as he can’t trust that anyone else will not be corrupted by him or even that someone good will not turn bad in his presence. It’s classic trauma, not just the theory but the full impact. 

Yanagihara’s imagination suggests to me she’s been close to these dark places. To know the depths of self-loathing a person can reach. Despite the efforts of Jude’s many friends to reach and help, he cannot get beyond the fundamental belief he is unworthy of love.

This story reminds me of Franz Kafka in his short story Metamorphosis. A boy reduced to a beetle, flat on his back and non-comprehending with disinterested parents, and a dispassionate sister. But I digress. 

St Jude is the patron Saint of lost causes. And Francis was both my mother’s and father’s favourite saint. He is the patron saint of animals. It’s said my father uttered these words before he died, that St Francis was a wonderful saint. Or some such words, but that might have been my mother’s wishful thinking. She was with my father soon before he died. My father was a master at self-loathing, despite his last-minute re-conversion to religion. 

St Jude, Patron saint of lost causes, of hope when all hope is gone.

Self-loathing. I suspect we all know something about it. The voice in your head telling you you’re useless, a blight on the landscape, a disgrace to humankind. Overdoses of shame then swamp you in a fog of self-criticism and the weird relief that comes from writing yourself off, before your conviction that others would instead.

When I was a child I loved Emily Dickinson’s poem:

 I’m nobody. Who are you? Are you Nobody too? 

She makes a virtue of this state: 

Then there’s a pair of us.

Don’t tell. They’d advertise, you know

How dreary to be somebody. 

How public like a frog 

To tell one’s name the livelong June

To an admiring Bog.

And a children’s verse comes to mind. I like to quote it out loud in sing song fashion to highlight the sensation. 

Nobody likes me
Everybody hates me
Guess I’ll go eat worms
Big, fat, juicy ones
Long, thin, slimy ones
Itsy bitsy, fuzzy wuzzy worms
Down goes the first one
Down goes the second one
Oh, how they wiggle and squirm!
Big, fat, juicy ones
Long, thin, slimy ones
Itsy bitsy, fuzzy wuzzy worms
Up comes the first one
Up comes the second one
Oh, how they wiggle and squirm!
Big, fat, juicy ones
Long, thin, slimy ones
Itsy bitsy, fuzzy wuzzy worms
Nobody likes me
Everybody hates me
Guess I’ll go eat worms!

The strange comfort we get from chastising ourselves, not in the modest way of recognising our mistakes and limitations, but in an all-encompassing and massive way that reckons we’re despicable. Despicable Me. Like one of the minions, only worse.

Yanagihara’s words about the logic of the sick appear after Jude in a wheelchair because walking causes him too much pain in his legs, arrives at his apartment after a long day at the office. He’s a whizz bang lawyer in New York.

He lives on the fifth floor but the lift has stopped working. He rings the few friends he’s prepared to call upon but none of them are available. His closest friend Willem, at a party, doesn’t hear his phone ring.

After moments of despair, Jude starts to lug himself up the one hundred plus steps. Dragging his folded wheelchair behind. He collapses midway and tries his friends again.

Half an hour later he drags himself up the final stretch, finally reaches his apartment, gets inside, then loses consciousness. 

When Willem reaches him, Jude’s out cold and drooling. Willem calls Andy, Jude’s doctor and a friend. When Jude wakes up hours later, both independently ask him: ‘What were you thinking?’

Why didn’t he call so or so and so. Why didn’t he wait for Willem to come. Then Yanagihara offers the simple words: ‘impossible to explain to the healthy the logic of the sick.’

So many layers of meaning here. This book is an attempt to explain to all of us who can bear to read, the ways in which the unmitigated abuse of a child can turn the life of even the most gifted into a never ending cycle of self hatred and cruelty. The book makes sense of self destruction in ways I can see more clearly than ever before.

We need books like these, despite the pain they evoke. We need to understand the lives of those so wounded they can never overcome their pain. We need to accompany them on their journeys so we can better understand and try to stop the cruelties that give rise to such lives in the first place.