The incest taboo serves perpetrators

2023, the year of the rabbit, of jumping over obstacles and coming into luck.

None so far from what I see. Or so says the miserable me. While every day is a day of luck, says the optimist.

Be grateful you’re still alive. These words have a church-like quality, as of straight from my mother’s mouth.

I’ve been thinking about her lately. The anniversary of her death on 10 August, nine years ago. The way she cried in her 92nd year when she heard about the death of her six years younger sister far away in Holland.

My mother did not grieve so visibly over her three brothers. They went before their sister, even the youngest, the first to die when he was only eighty. 

My mother and her siblings. In 1982 before they hit advanced old age.

My mother had expected it, given her youngest brother’s years of ill health with leukemia. And expectation of the worst outcome is a good way to foreclose the feeling when it happens.

It’s no surprise then.

You’ve grieved ahead of time in tiny increments and never fully experience the full rush of sorrow that comes on you unexpectedly when someone drops dead out of the blue.

Out of the blue. Out of nowhere, only it’s never quite like this. There are hints of its arrival beforehand, however much we ignore the red flags of the future. 

I went to an all-day seminar on the perversity of child sexual abuse where three women speakers filled the day with their words at the Wheeler Centre. They organised this event themselves. No one else had wanted to put on such an event. And because of the sensitive content, they restricted numbers.

The first speaker opened the session to say nothing in the room should leave it. One of those events when we’re urged to secrecy. This is strange when I think on it because the whole time during the discussion – still seeping into my bones – they encouraged us to speak out about our truths.

The incest taboo only serves the perpetrators and one way to counter it is to talk about it. Yet here we were, a group of some forty people, encouraged to speak and to listen while also urged to wrap ourselves inside a bubble. 

Now writing about it here, I find myself perplexed.

Funny the way incest begets more secrecy. It happens in secret and then you’re urged not to speak about it. When you do, shame washes over you yet again. As if you hold a terrible secret that no one else can know and it becomes so powerful it’s almost overwhelming.

For me there was an additional load. The ghosts of the analysts were there in the form of one speaker, an analyst whose paper was most harrowing of all because she talked about the sexual abuse of infants and young children. The whole time she spoke I wanted to vomit. The room was electric, and everyone sat silent, mesmerised. 

As much as these talks left me reeling, the day itself was an adventure. Into the city on the tram, then out on a train towards Brighton – my first ever journey on the Sandringham line – in drizzling rain, for an early birthday dinner for a friend who also joked about keeping her age of seventy a secret. 

I told her there was nothing to be ashamed of. But she worries about the prejudice of publishers who won’t touch a writer past a certain age for fear we will not produce more. 

In the middle of this sumptuous and generous dinner with nine people, including the birthday person’s friends and family, we listened on and off to the gruelling game between the determined French soccer team and the wonderful Matildas. 

I’m not given to paying much attention to sport of any ilk, but this game had me hankering for success. Mostly on behalf of my youngest daughter who was out with friends in Brunswick to watch the game.

She was desperate for the Matilda’s success. A soccer team emblematic of change. Women playing a traditionally male game. 

We might say there’s one obstacle leapt over in the year of the Rabbit. But still one woman a year is killed in Australia through intimate partner violence. An underestimated fact that sticks in my throat.

My mother could once have been such a statistic. And we in turn. 

The bus trip I took as a child in my memory, seated beside my mother. A yellow bus that travelled along Canterbury Road and took you into the heart of the Camberwell shops. It dropped us at the top of the hill near the railway station.

My mother wanted to visit Dickory Dock, an underwear specialist, still standing today. She needed a new girdle.

In those days women were fitted out, not trusting their own ability to match their body size with the underwear needed. The cost of a girdle was an investment, like buying a new overcoat. Maybe almost as expensive. 

There was a picture theatre nearby on the corner of Broadway Boulevard and Bourke Road that’s since closed. Could it be I worked there as an usher when a teenager?

I have memories of doing this but no evidence beyond a faded memory of wandering through the Hoyts’ theatre aisles, torch in hand with an open flat box of ice-creams held by a cord around my neck and protruding from my chest. 

If I held this job, it was not for long. I was fourteen when we left Camberwell, so it must be the sight of myself as usher blended within my imagination and memory that has turned me into this young girl, purposeful and strong as she carries her goods to sell. And for the first time earning money of her own. 

Dickory Dock was nestled alongside other non-prepossessing shops near the Palace Hotel with its stench of beer and stale cigarettes. This was where my father must have bought his alcohol in the days we lived nearby. 

My mother in the fitting rooms of Dickory Dock and my father flashes bright in my mind. Like a shadow.

Through the gap under the curtain, my mother’s pink feet splay alongside the neat black heels of the assistant who was prodding and poking at her thick form to get the fitting just so. 

I watched my mother’s toes, a bunion on either side. The bunions had grown so big all her shoes were misshapen. I dreaded the thought the same might happen to me. Those deformed feet, nails poorly clipped as if it had been too hard for my mother to bend over and tend to them.

My sister often sat on the floor in front of my father’s chair to clip his toenails. He liked her to cut them short, and she, young person of many talents, obliged. 

My father will kill us all one day I thought waiting outside that cubicle. My mother first, then my useful sister, then me and my younger sisters and finally my brothers. 

And we would all lie there in pools of blood, our bodies piled high like the bodies I had seen in books on the Holocaust, only those bodies were naked, and my father would not have taken off our clothes beforehand.

At least, I hoped he would not. 

We took the yellow bus home again that day, back through the leafy streets of Camberwell and when we arrived home, my father was seated in his chair by the fireside, blue soldiers of flame standing in formation along the gas heater. My mother timid as a mouse.

All this in 1966, the year of the horse in the Chinese calendar. People born that year have good instincts and powers observation. They can think for themselves, despite their enthusiasm and friendly impulses. And they’re good at jumping over hurdles. 

‘Dating your dad’

For the past few days we’ve been living under a threatening cloud. Heavy rains are happening across this state and at any moment you could be flooded.

Beware of drowning.

Alert messages on your mobile. Reports on the news everywhere.

Here’s a good example of climate change, but climate change gets no mention. The authorities only urge us to take care and in the process some of us get spooked.

I tend to take situations such as these with a grain of salt, not the fact of climate change but the doom mongering.

Still, I don’t live in a regional area, like Euroa, where flooding is a serious problem.

This weekend even city folks avoid going out onto the streets or going to appointments because it’s dangerous on the roads.

The warning is a blanket warning that applies to all of us everywhere across Victoria but only some of us will be affected. Yet we must operate as though we are all in peril.

It’s pernicious, this spread of anxiety, while elsewhere there are folks peddling ‘fake news’ so that we are even more alarmed about things that we might be less concerned about if we knew the truth of the matter.

And then there are other still concerns that go under wraps.

I’ve been thinking about how to engage in a conversation about incest. Not the most sexy of topics, incest.

People’s eyes glaze over at the mention of the word. One of the greatest taboos in our society.

The other day, I came across an essay written in 1997 by an academic, Laura Frost about Kathryn Harrison’s memoir The Kiss.

Frost describes how problematic it is when a person writes about having a sexual relationship with their father during their early twenties.

I read The Kiss a number of years ago and relished the beauty of Harrison’s writing. I trembled at the degree of her suffering, made worse, I expect, because of the reception she copped.

So many people reckoned she was simply cashing in on the salacious side of things.  She was taking advantage of her story of going off and conducting ‘an affair’ with her father. ‘Dating [your] dad’, as one reviewer, James Wolcott described it, when to his mind, Harrison should have kept her mouth shut.

How could she write such stuff? What about her children? Would they be traumatised to know their mother had behaved so badly as to go about having ‘an affair’ with her father and then worse still for Harrison to write a book about it so that all the world could read about her bad behaviour.

The bad publicity may well have promoted Harrison’s book, but the attacks on her integrity as a mother who should have protected her children from the knowledge of her ‘affair’ with her father must have been devastating.

How can we call such an experience an affair, as if one day a daughter ceases to be her father’s daughter – at any age?

Anyone who’s ever been a daughter and knows something of the thrall cast by a father, especially this father, who was not just a father but also a minister of religion, would wonder.

In my family, we girls fell in love with the priests, too.  A different type of father. We got it from our mother.

We hung around the church outside the presbytery just to get a glimpse of the curate.

The oldest girl had easier access. She used to get up at five o’clock in the morning and walk to church for early morning Mass. She might have been one of the few members of the congregation in the church at that time and surely the youngest.

It was easy for her to chat to the curate (assistant priest) after Mass.

This curate set the scene for our addiction to priests. He even came to visit our house and although it took me no time to work out that he was coming to see my oldest sister, her company alone, it pleased me to be able to be in such close contact with a priest.

In those days the priests wore black with a white dog collar.

The curate was tall and angular, but most striking was his accent. It rippled like water over rocks, a thick Irish brogue unlike any voice I had ever heard except on television,

I sometimes wondered whether my mother noticed the way the curate looked at my sister. Or did she wish his gaze was for her, as I had wished it was for me.

How easy it is to blame ourselves for our sinful desires, as it is to blame Kathryn Harrison for falling in love with her father.

Few of her critics seemed to consider her father’s behaviour. This consensual relationship between an adult daughter in her late teens /early twenties and her priest minister father should not have happened but the daughter copped the brunt of rage.

Why do people hate it when people who’ve gone through the hell of sexual abuse start to speak about it, to write about it and raise their voices, to say this happened to me and it was awful?

And also sometimes thrilling, playing havoc with our desires.

When I was twelve: 

Why is it that people find it so hard to offer a compassionate response when such revelations come to light?

Why do we hate the ones who’ve slipped this way?

I ask these questions and I suspect I have some answers, including my suspicion that many people don’t want to be unsettled by the complexity of parent/child relationships once disrupted by incest.

More so, they don’t want to consider the possibility that a twenty year old woman still has a particular relationship with her adult father that is loaded.

It reminds me of the difficulties people have when they hear of a mother who once relinquished her infant son to adoption, say twenty or thirty years ago, and then encounters her child in adulthood, only to fall passionately and sexually in love. They call it: Genetic sexual attraction.

There are multiple possibilities in such encounters but one possibility and it happens more often than people want to know, mother and son (usually hetero, but it could well happen with same sex parent/child connections or with biological siblings and biological fathers), fall in love with their long lost daughter, son, brother, sister.

This again constitutes incest despite the fact that both parties are adults at the time of sexual union.

It unsettles us to hear about these things because again the adult/child bond is violated.

I’ve been thinking about incest ever since my book came out because I’m keen to explore the  taboo but I fear it’s not a topic people want to consider for too long given it’s power to unsettle.

We find it easier to panic about storms ahead. At least they’re concrete and visible, but emotional storms are not so easy to negotiate.