‘All day, all night, the body intervenes…’

‘I rode on a red bus, inside a clot of blood.’ Janet Frame on learning of Sylvia Plath’s death.

Grief does not get much deeper than this. To find words to convey the enormity of a sensation that travels without words in our blood streams in the marrow of our bones, red hot and throbbing.

I’d rather not think too hard about my own griefs. The way the blood trickled down my leg as the tiny speck of life I had been carrying for ten weeks ebbed away into nothingness. Blood again.

I’d rather not think about the bloodless way the analysts dismissed me from their training because as one said, I did not have the stuff it takes to do this work to analyse and understand another in the way all analysts believed understanding ran.

In the blood again. Constitutional, he said. Some have it. Most don’t. Rather like a vocation to the priesthood or convent.

God is calling you. You may not want to hear the call but there are not many he calls. Or as the saying goes, there are many who are called but few are chosen. And I, too, was among those rejected.

I’d rather not think about my ageing body, the way the blood sludges through my veins less usefully these days.

The way my mind cannot accommodate all the massive griefs of this wide world caught up in conflicts I hoped might one day end, only to realise they most likely never will.

‘All day, all night, the body intervenes. The creature within can only gaze through the pane –smudged or rosy – it cannot separate off from the body.’ Virginia Woolf On Being Ill.

The body, the earth, this overused, abused creature within all of us who cannot withstand the rigours we put it through and then in time must rejoin the cosmos.

The other day I went to Ivanhoe for one of my writer’s group meetings at the Banyule library in a room we were able to use free of charge for ninety minutes until other people arrived and ordered us out.

I had arrived early and waited outside in the courtyard watching steams of kids from Ivanhoe Grammar rock up for some type of event. Younger ones with parents and others alone or with friends. Their blue blazers resplendent against the blue sky. Their youth and optimism seemingly well placed in face of the life that lies ahead of them. 

Inside the library, split into multiple levels with the usual stacks of books, and cubby holes in which people can hide away, there was also a small gallery. A friend and I visited after our meeting to view a few painters from the Heidelberg School on loan from the National Gallery.

I have never been one for art shows, for gazing at paintings from a distance much as I admire the work of artists and wish that I too could paint like several of my siblings and a couple of my children.

How is it when my grandchildren ask me to draw a dinosaur, dog or train I feel paralysed into indecision?  And incompetence.

Like most children there must have been a time when I could draw as well as the rest of them, but that raw talent that comes with an artist’s eye evades me now.

So, I reserve my palette for words. Words I can splatter onto the page to form patterns and images that might make sense to the reader.

As Zadie Smith urges, I try my best to write without desire. Here I am an artist on their first draft. Not much is taking shape here. Nothing I can pinpoint as the heart of my essay, the thick red vein running through carrying the blood of my success, an image that others can make sense of.

I lunched with my friend after our visit to the gallery. She ate avocado and mushrooms on toast and I enjoyed fruit bread with lashings of butter. Cups of tea and conversation. Endless conversation, the life blood of my existence. If I did not have conversation I think I might die.

Later in the afternoon I shared another conversation with another friend with whom our blood does not run so freely.

We sit on the edge of estrangement for reasons I cannot fully fathom.

Why do I keep on trying? She wants friendship of the treacle variety, warm and friendly and ever so sweet.

Friends must be tolerant of one another, but to my mind friends must also be able to argue the toss. To get their disagreements out into the open and battle out their wounds. Survive them together to come to an understanding even if it is one of tolerating our differences.

Empathy is a matter of imagination. To put yourself into the shoes if another. To see you as they might see you and to help them to see you as you might see yourself. It’s treacherous territory.

Over the course of my long lifetime, I have enjoyed many friendships. Those glorious connections with another when the call coming through sets my heart a little faster at the prospect of connection.

I have also watched as friendships died. Some times through geographical distance when people move away for a change of scene or occupation.

When I left school I imagined the friends I forged in those final school years would stay close forever. But not so. At university where over four years I carved other friendships with more progressive friends. I thought they too would last forever. 

The boys from St Bernards, a close group. They still meet. I see them together on Facebook, but I am on the periphery a memory for some but for most invisible. Never quite fitting in. 

And then in my profession over the years in one association and other friendships that meant we shared food in one another’s houses. They too came and went like the seasons only these have not returned.

When we meet as we occasionally might years later, the spark that once set our hearts blazing is weak. And I wonder how it could have been that once in my life I valued your company and now our friendship is over.

When I first met the man I came to marry, and to whom I remain married, a man with whom I have endured many if the undulations that come in any long-lasting connection, he told me words to the effect: ‘Blood is thicker than water.’ 

We both valued our family connection. But over time we formed our own family and the families that once firmed us although still present in our lives serve as bedrock to our beating hearts, but they are not the heart itself.

The blood that courses through our veins has shifted its course.

And when one of us leaves the other behind, the one left behind will ride the red bus like Janet Frame caught in that crimson blood clot, the congealed blood of a wound that will never heal, like the loss of the baby I never saw come to life.

There are some losses we can never overcome. They are part of who we become, and we die with them clasped firmly in arms. To be grieved for in our turn by those we might leave behind. Others who must climb the steps into that red bus, a congealed clot of blood. 

Public or private?

I saw the picture of a still born baby of twenty weeks on
someone’s blog yesterday.  The
folks at Mamamia put it up in the interests of helping people who have
suffered a miscarriage.  
It shocked
me and clearly, not only me. The editors at Mamamia equivocated about putting
up the pictures as well. 
There’s something devastating and surreal about the sight
of such a tiny underdeveloped baby, one who should still be inside his mother’s
womb and alive, not outside in the world before-term and dead.
 
I do not oppose the publication of such images on line
because something tells me the motive behind their publication is not one of inducing
gratuitous shock.  It’s more an effort to help people share the load of their grief.
So many horrible things are otherwise veiled in secrecy
and hidden from the public view.  People must bear the worst of it alone. 
My own miscarriage happened when my baby was only ten
weeks into life.  There was no
foetus to be seen.  It was no less
traumatic for me for that, but to get to twenty weeks and lose a baby would
have to be worse.  The further into
a pregnancy, the more alive that baby becomes in one’s imagination, and to lose
a baby full term must be worst of all. 
But why compare these events?   They are all ghastly in their own right.  The thing about this woman publishing
the photos from her still born baby’s brief stay in the world is meaningful in a world where many would prefer not to know the details.  While others search for them.  
 
I had an email recently from a woman who read some of my writing and
cannot understand my motives for writing about the traumatic events from my
childhood and my attempts now as an adult to understand them through my writing.  She believes my musings
belong in a diary or journal.  They
are not for publication.
 
Clearly, there’s a whole range of views about what is fit
for the public view and what should stay private.  
As one who comes from an incestuous family, I lean towards
more exposure of these things in the public view because too much secrecy can
be dangerous.  Witness Edward Snowden and other whistleblowers of renown.
 
I also recognise the wish I felt when I saw that unborn
baby not yet ready for the world, my wish to turn away, and not to see
something so disturbing, so raw, so unprocessed. 
And then
there’s all this derision for those who take selfies and put them online,
particularly, the pretty young women. 
Narcissism, the critics say. 
On the other hand, it seems it’s okay for any other person to take a
self portrait, including centuries of artists who have recreated their
self images as one of least difficult ways to get a model and so practice their
craft.
 
Narcissism or artistry?  Catharsis or gratuitous shocking of unwitting and unwilling others?  
Who knows?  As far as I can tell, the jury is still undecided.